fbpx
Home Blog Page 1619

It’s a Match: Essential Skills Mapped to Critical Business Functions

0
It’s a Match: Essential Skills Mapped to Critical Business Functions

By Kyle Clark, Enterprise Content Strategist

Coursera’s Essential Skills Map identifies the skills of tomorrow for key functions, future-proofing your workforce while helping your business keep pace with digital transformation.

———-

Technology is rapidly transforming the nature of jobs and skills. Partnering with over 1,900 companies globally through Coursera for Business takes us deep into the evolving skills landscape, where the increasing rate of digital change is reducing the half-life of skills. An ongoing challenge for companies is to reliably identify the future skills they will need. The World Economic Forum points to a ‘growing skills instability’ and estimates that the core skills required to perform most roles will change by 42% (on average) by 2022. More than ever, employees must walk a tightrope between improving current skills and acquiring new skills. Companies need to anticipate and invest in developing future skills that will matter while also steering investment away from skills that will become obsolete. Those who linger will increasingly be disrupted by agile, digitally transformed players vying for a piece of their market share.

To address the skills transformation problem, we have developed an Essential Skills Map for Digital Transformation – our recommendations of the critical skills you need to compete and succeed in your industry. Our Essential Skills Map is based on an exhaustive analysis of data from millions of Coursera learners on trending and future skills, from AI to design thinking, that key functions in your organization need. In other words, these are the skills employees in critical teams should be learning to help you stay ahead of the competition.

Essential skills by function (no one size fit all)
Coursera’s Essential Skills Map is based on learner enrollments, performance data, and insights from over 40 million learners globally combined with our experience partnering with over 1,900 enterprise customers from around the world. Our algorithms determine the top skills learners in specific roles are pursuing. We then add insights from our content experts and enterprise partners to distill the data into recommendations by skill and function. The final result is the Essential Skills Map, which displays the top three recommended skills in business, technology, and data that learners need across specific business functions.

Competency mapping made easy
We hear time and time again from our customers that creating competency and skill maps for multiple functions is expensive and time-intensive. Even worse, many of our customers’ competency maps become out of date soon after launch. But companies need some way to understand skills across functions in order to achieve their goals, especially since digital transformation requires organization-wide changes. The Essential Skills Map solves for the initial heavy lifting of competency mapping by helping you pinpoint future skills across your most critical business functions. It also stays up-to-date because the Map itself is based on dynamic data from our platform that automatically updates over time. In short, we provide the latest skills map so you can continuously identify where you need to focus.

Matching trending skills to courses from the world’s leading institutions
Besides identifying the top skills for major functions, the Essential Skills Map also matches the corresponding courses that your employees can take on Coursera to acquire those skills. For example, the top skills for Engineering include Leadership, Agile Management, and Machine Learning, so we recommend the following courses: Foundations of Everyday Leadership, Digital Product Management: Modern Fundamentals, and Neural Networks and Deep Learning. We provide similar recommendations across functions including Data Science, Finance, and Marketing, as well as Management.

To get started and access the Essential Skills Map for your organization, reach out to our Essential Skills Specialists. Customers, contact your Customer Success Manager for more details.

Coursera’s Essential Skills Map builds on Coursera’s rich database of talent insights and is used by organizations worldwide to design winning workforce transformation strategies. Learn more about how your industry stacks up in the skills of tomorrow in the Coursera Global Skills Index 2019.

 

US vs China: Will they make amends at the G20 Summit?

0
US vs China: Will they make amends at the G20 Summit?

Like an awkward run in with an ex at a house party, President Trump and President Jinping are likely to meet in Osaka this June at the G20 Summit.

Although neither party has agreed to a meeting yet, Osaka is seen as the last opportunity for the two presidents to talk and resolve things before the situation worsens, and Trump enters the 2020 presidential campaign.

Donald Trump, an avid ‘Tweeter’, enraged China with empty threats of increased tariffs and other disparaging remarks on Twitter. Now, the pair are no longer on speaking terms. If they sit down together at the G20, then it will likely result in a big win for everyone.

So, let’s get up to speed with the situation, and find out why Jinping and Trump are trading blows.

What is the G20 Summit?

The G20 Summit is an international forum, where leaders of the 19 member countries and the European Union (20 in total) come together. Their aim is to discuss, and ultimately, cooperate to achieve global economic growth. The member countries (and the European Union) consist of the largest economies and trade nations in the world, like Australia, India, Mexico, Germany and the US and China. Each country sends a delegation including the Finance Minister and the head of the central bank.

The first summit was held in 1999, with representatives meeting to ensure financial stability and solve global issues together such as pollution.

The US-China trade war

The US and China are currently in a trade war, which is where two states create or increase tariffs, and impose other trade barriers on each other. For example, a country may put a complete embargo on the importation of goods from another country.

The US-China situation has far-reaching impacts, damaging the global economy. Given that both countries are some of the biggest economies in the world, the tension shifts the footing of almost everything. Companies have to review their supply chains and operations, growth slows or stalls, and political tension can spill over into conflict.

President Trump is threatening high tariffs on Chinese goods in the US if President Jinping refuses to meet during the G20 summit. The threat is a stalemate – if Jinping accepts he may be perceived as weak at home in China, but if he refuses it could cost both local and global economies enormously.

The US has also banned Huawei Technologies Co. over suspicions it’s acting as spy arm for the communist party. Beijing has responded by drafting a list of ‘unreliable’ US entities, impacting their operations in the region.

US companies (and the US Government) are looking to Taiwan for back-up solutions, which rattles the cage for China even more.

China will also likely want to downplay any negative influence from the recent Hong Kong protests, where some two million people spilled into the streets to denounce the extradition law that would see residents deported to mainland China.

Jinping finds himself in a very tough position entering the G20 summit, so it’s also in his best interests to find a solution in tandem with Trump.


With G20 approaching, it is with great hope that leaders take the high road, put their differences aside, and settle on solutions that are truly beneficial. If not, our global economy is looking at some serious implications.

Accounting: It’s the language of business

0
Accounting: It’s the language of business

Despite the common perception, accounting is more than just crunching numbers. Half of what any accountant will do involves written and verbal communication – interpreting what is going right and wrong and explaining exactly what the numbers mean to stakeholders.

When you’ve got an accounting degree, the door is open to practically any industry. You’ve got the choice of different types of organisations, such as government, accounting firms, large-scale corporations or small businesses, with the opportunity to fulfil any role from accounts payable to Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

With such flexibility of employment, you’re free to choose a workplace that aligns with who you are, and what excites you.

Tom’s career in accounting

Tom Peskett works as a senior accountant for Prime Accounting and Business Advisory, and was kind enough to spare some time to chat about a career in accounting. “Before I got into the industry, I thought it was just a lot of numbers and data crunching,” recalls Tom, “but I realise it’s more about being an advisor to your client, being able to explain information to them, and being able to manage their expectations.”

Tom Peskett on his laptop

Tom Peskett – Accountant in Melbourne

Day to day, Tom is speaking to clients about their business, about tax compliance such as tax returns and financial statements, and helping them plan their financial future. As legislation is always changing, Tom is continually learning – change is all part of the job, and a successful accountant will embrace that.

The qualifications that helped Tom gain his role were a bachelor’s degree in business, a master’s degree in accounting, and a Chartered Accountants qualification. Graduates of course need good technical skills, but what’s also important is the soft skills, which will help them develop relationships with their clients, and communicate well in general in both a written and verbal manner. Accounting does require commitment to study, but the reward is a stable role within any number of different industries – take your pick.

What to expect from an accounting degree

A general accounting degree will provide a foundation of knowledge, which can then lead to specialised study in such areas as auditing, tax accounting, management accounting, or forensic accounting.

The staff that convene University of South Australia’s Bachelor of Accounting, on offer through Open Universities Australia (OUA), graciously talked us through the course content. “When you study accounting you will learn basic business functions, day to day transactions, understanding statements and the bottom line,” says Heather Prider, coordinator for ACG11 Accounting for Business.

Students will discover how accounting is used in business decision-making processes, and learn about debits, credits, journal entries, and ledger – all the elements that build basic statements. They’ll also come to understand what’s involved in analysing statements (income statements, cash flow statements, balance sheets etc.) and how to examine and utilise the data to make better business decisions.

In terms of degree structure – core subjects delve into economics, statistics, business law, management concepts, marketing, tax law, and auditing practice. Elective subjects will help you understand accounting in a broader context, through the study of topics like international business, human resources, and business ethics.

Study online through OUA

If you’ve got a busy lifestyle with many in-person commitments, why not study an accounting degree online? Through Open Universities Australia, you’ll study the same coursework as an on-campus student, and graduate with the same degree. If you don’t have an extensive academic history, you’re still able to enter a degree by first competing pre-requisite subjects (which count towards your degree, so no time wasted.) With plenty of help available from both your university tutors and OUA student advisors, there’s no need to feel isolated or anxious – we’ve got your back.

Accounting degrees on offer:

Bachelor of Accounting – University of South Australia

Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting) – Curtin University

Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting) – University of South Australia

Master of Professional Accounting – RMIT University

Master of Professional Accounting – University of Tasmania

Accounting single subjects:

Many of the subjects included in our accounting degrees can also be studied in isolation as single subjects. This is a great way to brush up on your knowledge without making a big commitment. A number of these subjects have no pre-requisites, so you can start studying no matter your academic history. Be sure to check out the information on the webpage of each subject for specific entry details.


To express your interest in any of the courses we offer, accounting or otherwise – fill out the form on this page, and we’ll put you in touch with a friendly student advisor. If you’re keen to explore on your own, simply head over to our website to browse the extensive catalogue of courses from universities across Australia.

Adding Pages to a Blogger Blog

0
Adding Pages to a Blogger Blog

Adding pages (aka: a navigation bar or menu bar) is a great way to organize your blog to make important information easily accessible to your readers.

Designer Blogs offers several types of navigation bars: a navigation bar with simple text links, a navigation bar with custom buttons, and a navigation bar with drop-down menu (click on links for examples). These navigation bars are customized to give your blog a unique & professional look and can be purchased through our accessories shop.

However, you may just want a basic, non-customized Blogger menu bar, so today we are sharing a tutorial that explains how to get pages and a basic navigation bar added to your Blogger blog all on your own!


Steps for adding pages to your blog:

Step 1: Log in to the Blogger blog you are wanting to add pages to and click on the “Pages” link.

Step 2: Click the “New Page” button.

Step 3: Type the page title (this will appear as a link on the navigation bar), add the page content and then click “Publish.” Note: make sure the page is published or it will not show on your navigation bar.

Step 4: After your pages are published, you need to add the Pages gadget to your layout to make the categories appear on your blog. Go back to “Layout” and click on “Add a Gadget” in the space underneath the header. Note: If you want your navigation bar placed on your sidebar, click on “Add a Gadget” in the sidebar space.

Step 5: Choose “Pages” from the list of gadget options.

Step 6: Drag and drop your pages to rearrange them in the order you want them to appear and then click “Save.”


Adding a web address to your navigation bar:

Step 1: You may want to add some web addresses or links to labels along with your blank pages. Click on the “Pages” gadget and choose “+ Add external link.”

Step 2: In the first box, type the title you want to appear in the navigation bar. In the Web address (URL) box, insert the web address you want to link to. Then click “Save.”

Now view your blog to see your new pages and navigation bar!

RELATED POST: How to Link a Menu Bar Link to a Label or Category


For adjusting left aligned navigation menus

If you have a blog template with a left aligned navigation menu and you would like to adjust the positioning of the links, follow the below steps.

Step 1: In your dashboard, click on the “Theme” link and then click on “Customize.”

Step 2: In the Blogger Theme Designer click on “Advanced.”

Step 3: In the “Advanced” tab, scroll down until you find “Add CSS.”

To add more space to the left side of the navigation bar, add the following code:

.PageList {text-align:left !important; padding-left: 20px; }
.PageList li {display:inline !important; float:none !important; }

You will see a preview of how the design will look with the changes. If you adjust the “20” to a larger number it will add more space. If you want less space adjust the “20” to a smaller number. Adjust it as you want and then click “Apply to Blog” to save the changes.

Example:

To center the links, add the following code:

.PageList {text-align:center !important; }
.PageList li {display:inline !important; float:none !important; }

You’ll see a preview of the changes. If you are happy with the way it looks, click “Apply to Blog” to save the changes.

Example:

For any further customizations you might need made to your navigation bar, you can visit our add-on shop to purchase one of our navigation bar options.

Please feel free to leave a comment or contact us at [email protected] with any questions you may have.

Summer Reading Contest, Week 1: What Interested You Most in The Times This Week?

0
Summer Reading Contest, Week 1: What Interested You Most in The Times This Week?

Our Tenth Annual Summer Reading Contest begins!

To participate, just post a comment here by 9 a.m. Eastern on June 21 that answers the questions “What interested you most in The Times this week? Why?”

What should you choose? Well, as you know from the rules we’ve posted, you can pick anything published on NYTimes.com in 2019, including articles, essays, Op-Eds, videos, photos, podcasts or infographics.

So what did you read, watch or listen to this week? Maybe you were consumed by front-page headlines about the protests in Hong Kong — or maybe you were more taken with the Women’s World Cup or the Tony Awards.

We hope you’ll click around NYTimes.com and find your own great articles, features and multimedia, but we know that not everyone who participates has a Times subscription. Because all links to Times content from the student features on our site are free, every week we’ll try to help by posting interesting pieces from a variety of sections.

‘We Either Buy Insulin or We Die’

The Anti-College Is on the Rise

Roads, Smoke and Microsavings

We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster.

_________

Whatever caught your eye, tell us about it in the comments.

Need more details? The contest rules are all here, and you can read the work of last year’s winners here. A quick overview, though:

• You can choose from anything published in the print paper or on NYTimes.com in 2019, including videos, podcasts, graphics and photographs. (In your response, please include the URL or headline of the piece you pick.)

• We’ll post this question each Friday from today through Aug. 16, and you’ll have until the next Friday morning to respond with your picks. Then we’ll close that post and open a new one with the same question.

• We’ll choose at least one favorite answer to feature on our site each week. Winners from this week will be announced on July 2.

• Feel free to participate each week, but we allow only one submission per person per week.

• The contest is open to students ages 13 to 19 from anywhere in the world.

_________

While this is the only Student Opinion question we’ll be asking this summer, here is our section that features hundreds of writing prompts still open to comment.

GUEST POST: Cut It Out: Learning with Seductive Details

0
GUEST POST: Cut It Out: Learning with Seductive Details

NarayanKripa Sundararajan (Kripa Sundar), PhD, is the Learning Science Specialist at ISTE, where she manages initiatives to incorporate learning sciences in edtech procurement, policy, and classroom practice. At Washington State University, where Kripa finished her PhD, her research focused on instructional strategies (such as concept mapping and retrieval practice) and the role of individual differences on the effect of including seductive details in instructional material. You can follow her on Twitter: @KripaSundar

A picture is worth a thousand words, they say. Sometimes, we use pictures to practice dual-coding. Other times, we use pictures, jokes, fun facts, etc. to provide some much-needed respite. Have you ever wondered the trade-off with your audience’s learning? 

If you’ve heard of the seductive details effect, you probably have. Or, if you read Young’s post on designing better PowerPoint material, you probably have.

Seductive details can be text, images, audio, gifs, memes, animations – anything that is tangentially related to the content, interesting, and irrelevant to the learning objective (1) (2). The seductive details effect refers to the phenomenon where learners learn worse when seductive details are included than when they are excluded (3). Nothing can be that simple, can it?

Turns out – it is that simple. 

Summer Reading Contest, Week 2: What Interested You Most in The Times This Week?

0
Summer Reading Contest, Week 2: What Interested You Most in The Times This Week?

wesley morris

You and I try to live good, environmentally ethical lives.

jenna wortham

Oh yeah, we do what we can.

wesley morris

I, you know, try to keep my footprint no bigger than like, a kittens.

wesley morris

Maybe a bat.

jenna wortham

Yes, more realistic.

wesley morris

Does a bat have a footprint?

jenna wortham

A wingspan.

wesley morris

That’s how small I want it.

jenna wortham

Got it. You’re good.

wesley morris

And you know, in reality, I’m sure it’s like the size of the Grand Canyon, but whatever. Like, I’m trying to keep it kitten sized.

jenna wortham

You’re mindful, that’s what matters.

wesley morris

But every Wednesday I kind of lose it a little bit when I come home and I see what’s waiting for me on my stoop. [MUSIC PLAYING] It’s a little plastic bag, sometimes it’s three stuffed with a circular.

jenna wortham

Oh, you mean those things that look like the Sunday paper—

jenna wortham

—but they’re just stuffed full of coupons that aren’t even coupons? It’s just like, news about what’s on sale at Rite Aid or Food Town? I get those too, they drive me up the wall.

wesley morris

Well, what do you do about it?

jenna wortham

Well, I usually just nudge them off the stoop— [LAUGHTER] —into the trash can. It was just directly to the right of my stoop. And so as I’m walking up, I just kind of scoop them into the trash. But I feel so guilty about it. It’s like, unnecessary guilt I didn’t ask.

jenna wortham

What else can you do? [PHONE RINGING]

archived recording

How can I help you?

wesley morris

Hey there. I’m calling about my weekly circular. I just wanted to call and register that I didn’t want it this week, again.

archived recording

That you don’t want it or you didn’t get it?

wesley morris

No, no. I would not like to— I don’t want to receive it.

archived recording

OK, what is the address?

wesley morris

Uh, [BLEEP]

archived recording

OK. And you’ve called here before regarding this?

wesley morris

Uh, I call every week.

archived recording

OK. Let me see. Wesley?

wesley morris

Yes, that’s me.

jenna wortham

You call every week honey?

wesley morris

Yes. [MUSIC PLAYING]

jenna wortham

Is this why you wake up at 5:00 AM? Is this part of your morning routine? Like, don’t you have other— I know you have other things to do. I know how busy you are. You have important things to do.

wesley morris

I know. But this makes me so mad because it’s such a breach of the deal that I’ve made for myself about the kind of person I want to be in the world.

wesley morris

And to me, to walk up to my step—

wesley morris

—and see this white plastic bag. Again, let me just restate, sometimes three—

jenna wortham

Yeah, yeah.

wesley morris

It’s like a micro-aggression to me. You know, like it is—

jenna wortham

Mm-hmm. Against you and the planet.

jenna wortham

So what happens when you call?

archived recording

I will go ahead and update the reports and let the managers know, OK?

wesley morris

OK. You know, I had been asking for a manager to give me a call and I never— I never hear from the manager or anything.

archived recording

Um, let me see.

wesley morris

I keep getting the circulars. And I mean, I’m not upset at you, obviously. You didn’t do it.

archived recording

Oh, OK. No, I’ll go ahead and in the report, I’ll mention that you would like to speak to a manager as soon as possible, OK?

wesley morris

All right. Well I really appreciate you help me out.

archived recording

No problem.

wesley morris

Thanks a lot.

archived recording

No problem, have a good one.

archived recording

Bye bye. [MUSIC PLAYING]

wesley morris

That’s every week we do this.

jenna wortham

Has anything changed?

wesley morris

You mean about my blood pressure or about the circulars? Because the circulars are still there and I’m sure my blood pressure is higher.

wesley morris

Yeah. But I mean, I feel like I have this need to do something, right? I feel like I want to take control somehow rather than accept my fate of getting these circulars every week. Because the circulars really do— they make me angry.

jenna wortham

You know, it’s interesting. Because it’s kind of like the devil you know. It’s like, this is something that you can deal with that’s immediately in front of you. And I think it’s emblematic of a way, I think, that generally a lot of us are feeling when it comes to coping with any kind of environmental issue in this country.

jenna wortham

Like on one hand, you know, a devastating climate report comes out that says the temperature is going to go up no matter what we do and the consequences will be dire. And each day it feels like we’re getting new reports of some sort of devastating extreme weather condition, whether it’s droughts, or tornadoes in Alabama, or news of another hurricane. And we’re dealing with—

wesley morris

Fires, yeah.

jenna wortham

—California fires. The point I’m trying to make is that climate anxiety is real. And we see it in front of us and around us all the time.

wesley morris

Yeah. No, I mean, I definitely feel anxious. And I definitely feel like making these circulars stop would made me feel a lot better before I go into the house on a Wednesday evening. But nothing is changing and so I feel helpless.

jenna wortham

I think another word for what you’re feeling is powerless. You know, when it comes to thinking about what we can do to affect change around the environment, it’s really hard to feel like we have any power to change anything.

wesley morris

Well then, does my calling the distribution company mean I care too much?

jenna wortham

No honey, of course not. It’s just that, maybe there’s a better way to show that care. [MUSIC PLAYING] [PHONE RINGING]

david wallace-wells

Hello?

wesley morris

David Wallace-Wells, it’s Wesley and Jenna.

wesley morris

How are you?

david wallace-wells

I’m good. Great to talk to you guys.

jenna wortham

OK. So you wrote an incredible piece in New York Magazine last year called “The Uninhabitable Earth” and you just published a book by the same name. Congrats.

david wallace-wells

Thank you.

jenna wortham

And it’s really about how we deal with the devastating realities that await us as the result of climate change. And I’m calling today specifically to enlist you on a very personal campaign of mine to potentially try to change what a one Mr. Wesley Morris does every week that’s driving him insane.

david wallace-wells

What’s the problem?

jenna wortham

Well you lived in Brooklyn, so you’ve probably seen those coupons circulars that make their way around? And they look like the Sunday paper, but they’re all in white. And then we open them up, there’s like $0.10 off of bananas this week at Food Town. And you’re just like, what, do I need to know that? Have you seen these before?

david wallace-wells

I don’t think so, actually.

jenna wortham

They actually do function as kind of like, free litter. Like, you don’t want them, but it’s your responsibility to get rid of them. And Wesley is on a personal mission to get the company that delivers them to stop doing it, because he feels like this is the one thing that he can do to stop climate change.

david wallace-wells

Yeah. My feeling about like, what difference individuals can make is so much that the whole answer is politics. And that the way that we relate through what we buy and how we consume, we’d all be better people if we did that a little bit more responsibly. But the impacts are so small. And I think for a lot of people, they actually distract from the real urgency of the need to take political action to vote in particular, but also organize beyond that. And so I basically think that we can get around to cleaning up the circulars, we can get around to going vegan, and stopping our flying, and all that stuff. But by far the most important thing to do is just to get people into office who are going to take this thing seriously. And when I look around and I see people arguing about veganism, people arguing about what clothes you buy, and plastic consumption and all that stuff, it’s so small that it often feels like it’s just a way to distract ourselves from the real problem, you know? Making us feel active when we’re actually not all that active.

wesley morris

Oh, lord. [LAUGHTER] I mean.

david wallace-wells

The plastic thing is really interesting, because it’s been a huge movement, especially in England over the last year or so. One of the episodes of David Ambrose last series had a whole segment about plastic in the oceans. And there’s just been a huge upswell of concern about plastic in the oceans, which is— I mean, it’s awful. There shouldn’t be any plastic in the oceans. It’s gross. But there’s something so powerful about that image. It’s just like, when you look at a photo of water with debris in it, you’re like, that’s gross, we got to clean that up. And climate change is so much more complicated than that. Like, we can’t see carbon. It’s invisible. And I think that’s one of the reasons that we’ve been so distracted from the issue for so long, is that it’s been really hard to see it. It’s like, always something that’s been told to us. It’s almost like an abstraction. We were told it was coming distant in time, and it was distant in place, and it was visible.

wesley morris

Yeah. Yeah.

david wallace-wells

And we respond so much more to these— yeah, like the picture of the plastic island in the Pacific, or a picture of a polar bear, just because we can see it. But those things are so— I don’t know, at best marginal to the problem, you know? Not to depress you guys.

wesley morris

No, no, it’s— [LAUGHTER]

jenna wortham

But it’s reality thought.

wesley morris

Listen, I mean, I’m already depressed. And I’m angry, right? And I think that in some ways, to deal with the circulars— in some ways it’s disconnected for me from the larger problem. Like, the thing that your book is actually about is the thing I’m trying to live on the most microscopic level possible. And you know, this distribution company is an affront to my living in philosophical and practical accordance with the uninhabitable earth, your book.

david wallace-wells

Yeah. I mean, I think it seems like a kind of powerful metaphor for the problem. So like, in the US, I think we waste about a third of our food.

david wallace-wells

We Waste like 70% of our electricity. Like, it’s literally wasted on the way from wherever it’s being produced to your home because our grid is in such bad shape. 70% of it. Which means if we built a new grid, we could cut out the carbon footprint of our energy production by 70%. And there’s so many features of modern life like that, especially for people in the West. Especially relatively well-off people in places like New York City. Even when we think, we’re urbanites, we live in the city, we don’t drive much, we walk, we’re eating good local food, et cetera, there’s so many features of our life that are just full of waste. And every one of those wastes does add up. I mean, I applaud you. You’re a better man than I am. Like, I’m not taking action at that level. But those solutions, for me, they have to be political. It’s like, to get that one company out of business, it’s going to make such a small difference. But if for instance, there could be a law that was banning all plastic production. There could be a law that was like, New York City has no cars in it. Those solutions scale up from the quite plausible to the kind of implausible seeming. But all the ones that are consequential I think are achieved through politics. And we live in this gross moment where we’re told that we make our mark on the world through how we consume, politically. Like, we register our politics through our— what we eat, what we wear, even the music that we listen to, the movies that we watch. And I just think that’s such a diversion from actual political action. Like, if you really define listening to the right music as the most meaningful political choice that you’re making— I mean, obviously music is political. But if you’re defining that as the core of your political relationship to the world, you’re leaving aside so much power that you have in a country like ours to really make change. Not to sound like such a naive American flag waver or whatever.

david wallace-wells

Obviously there’s huge problems in our system. But the opportunities are there. And I don’t know. When people would talk about the inertia of the system, it’s like, yeah the system is inert, but we still get to vote in it. We still get to try to make change. And I feel like we give up on that too easily and are too enamored with virtue signaling through consumption choices.

jenna wortham

Well I hear all of that and I get it. I think I’m trying to reconcile that political imperative with the very real ways that our political system feels uninterested in those issues. And so how do you make sense of that when we’re living under administration that is actively de-prioritizing climate change and doing things like extracting the US from the Paris Agreement? Or putting climate deniers in cabinet positions? And even though there are exciting policy proposals out like the Green New Deal, but everything we read about and hear about it is that it’s unlikely to pass. So how do you get people to see that political change as the most important thing when all signs right now in this moment kind of point to political inaction around climate change?

david wallace-wells

I mean, I think if you took a sort of long view, there’s a lot of really exciting movements. I think the numbers are 73% of Americans now believe in climate change. 70% of them are concerned about it. Those numbers are up 15% since 2015. They’re up 8% since March.

david wallace-wells

So extreme weather has been a grotesque teacher. The California wildfires— I’m actually out in California now reporting on wildfires. And even watching them around the country, watching from around the world, I think people have really woken up to just how horrifying the future could be if we don’t change course. And heat waves, hurricane after hurricane in the Caribbean, flooding all around South Asia, I just think the news has been teaching the world to wake up on this issue. And when you see like, in Europe, there’s Greta Thunberg and the climate strike. There’s a movement in the UK called Extinction Rebellion. In the US we’ve had Sunrise, which has led to the Green New Deal, which is— you know, there’s huge questions about it. It’s basically just like a statement of principles. It’s not really a piece of legislation you could put into action right now. But it puts the science first. That’s like, unprecedented in American political climate history. It’s like, opens with quotes from the UN About what’s necessary and then tries to find a policy response that could fulfill those goals rather than defining our goals through what’s politically possible. And that is like, just a huge sea change. Now like, will it come to pass in something like the form that AOC and Ed Markey hope?

wesley morris

Yeah. AOC being Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

david wallace-wells

But like, her arrival in the house alone has made climate a much, much, much more central issue for our politics. And when you look at those numbers, 73% and 70%, it’s like we pass everything about our culture through prisms of politics now. So there’s these stats about how when you control for race, Democrats and Republicans actually had the same opinions about the guilt of OJ Simpson. And that is just unthinkable now. Now everything about the way we think about everything is passed through our partisan identities. And when you see those numbers that high in that light, you’re like, wow, that’s actually incredible. 73% of Americans believe climate change is real, 70% of them are worried about it. Given how tribalized, how partisan our politics are and our culture is, I don’t know. In certain ways I’m a climate alarmist, in other ways I guess I’m a climate optimist, because I see a lot more movement actually than I would have expected 5, 10 years ago. Not that I was personally affected by climate 5 by 10 years ago. But it just seems like from any political science metric, things are moving really, really fast. And the problem is that the UN says we’ve got 12 years to have global emissions to avoid what they call the threshold of catastrophe. Two degrees—

wesley morris

To cut them in half, basically.

david wallace-wells

Yeah.

david wallace-wells

And if we hit two degrees, that’s— two degrees is a level that the island nations of the world called genocide. And that’s not unreasonable. Those nations will be underwater. And if we hit two degrees, I mean, that’s like walking through the horror show. But they think that many of the biggest cities in the Middle East and South Asia will be unlivibly hot in summer a two degrees, which could happen as soon as 2050. The UN thinks there could be 200 million climate refugees. They think there actually could be as high as one billion climate refugees, which is as many people as live in North and South America combined. [INTERPOSING VOICES]

wesley morris

OK, wait, you’re warming up the studio in here. [LAUGHTER] It’s just like you just dropped 400 bags of circulars in my ears right now. The question I want to ask you based on all of this stuff, which by the way is perfectly explained and evocatively explained in the book, like the worst case scenario. But eventually, your climate optimism surfaces. But what happens between election cycles? I know that the voting is the most important thing. And if the right people run and I vote for them, we’re good, or we’re on the path to being good. But that’s a lot of waiting every two years to make that change.

david wallace-wells

Well, there’s a lot of grassroots activism going on all around the world. And I think anyone can be a part of that. I think you can do constituency contact, like showing up at Dianne Feinstein’s office and shaming her about her—

david wallace-wells

Let me give you my spiel that’s like, it’s possible to be optimistic about it. When you think about all these horrors that are possible— I mentioned a few of them— those are a reflection of the power that we have over climate.

david wallace-wells

If we get to four degrees of warming by the end of the century, which is what we’re on track for, that will be because of choices we make going forward. There’s a little bit of a delay in the climate system. But it’s not much of a delay. And we’re doing the damage we’re doing now basically in real time. Half of the emissions that humanity has produced and put into the atmosphere and the burning fossil fuels have come in the last 30 years, which means we’ve done as much damage since Al Gore published his first book on warming, since the premiere of Seinfeld, than we did in all of the centuries before. And that’s horrible, but it also means that we are doing this. We have our hands on the levers. And the most important input going forward is human action, what we do, how much carbon we emit, what action we take. So when we think about the future, we are heading on track for some really awful outcomes. But the scale those horrors is a reflection of just how much power we have to control the climate. There are climate deniers who are like, oh, this is just natural warming, it’s not human made. And I’m like, that should terrify you more. If we were heading down this path and had no control over it, that would be crazy. But we’re in this situation—

wesley morris

Yes. Yes. All the farting the earth is doing is perfectly natural. You should still want the gas to stop.

jenna wortham

Right, right.

david wallace-wells

Right.

jenna wortham

David, I think the thing I keep coming back to in this is voting in this country is really complicated for people of color.

david wallace-wells

Yeah.

jenna wortham

I mean, you have things like voter suppression. You have things like ballot manipulation, North Carolina that— things that even impact at a very local level. Not even talking at a presidential, not even at that scale. But things that prevent regular shmegular Joes from getting into office. And typically what happens is for low income people, or people of color, they’re the ones that deal with these issues the most. And they have the least political representation and tend to be the most impacted by things like climate change, although soon we’ll all be as equally impacted by climate change. But I don’t know how to make sense of that either. Because if voting is our best option and yet the powers that be keep those of us that are impacted from being even able to vote, what do we do about that?

david wallace-wells

I mean, it’s a hard problem. It’s even harder when you look globally. Climate change punishes unequally. It is already exacerbating inequality, but it will exacerbate it more. And that happens within nations, but it also happens between nations. And the people of the Middle East and South Asia are already suffering intensely from climate change. There’s also the question of, how do we protect whole nations? I mean, Bangladesh is really in immediate peril. Over the next generation they could have— where half of their population lives, it would be underwater. And that’s not even counting the kind of economic impact that would come from all of the additional flooding beyond the direct sea level rise. And it’s an incredible moral burden on the world as a whole, on the planet as a whole. And I think we’re going to see a new politics emerge. We had after World War II a global order come around that was in name committed to human rights, peace and prosperity, et cetera. That was often an alibi for bad behavior, it often involved continued oppression. But the world was probably still better served by a system that held up those values a central than one that didn’t. And I think that we’re likely to see a similar system emerge that really puts the issue of climate change at the very center of political discourse. So you hear MBS, the kind of awful leader of Saudi Arabia saying the country’s economy needs to get off oil by 2050. 100% off oil by 2050. I think he said he wants them to get close to that by 2030. And to me, that contains wisdom about the future of the world. That you won’t be able to continue producing this stuff and still expect a seat at the table of nations as soon as a couple of decades from now because the world just won’t allow it. There’ll be at the very least sanctions. And it sounds crazy to say, but I think that there could be military action to enforce and respond to bad behavior on climate. And we have heard a lot of wars that were fought in the name of human rights. Not to say that all of them or even any of them were good ideas. But I think that we are sort of headed in that direction, which is a ways away from the question you asked, Jenna. And that’s in part because I don’t think there’s really a great answer for it except the answers that we all try to give to that question more generally beyond climate, which is just, we have to fight to give everyone access to the political system as best we can. And whether that’s through community organizing, whether it’s through federal reform and everything in between, it’s obviously a hugely important vector for climate action as it is important vector for all of our political futures. Because we need to have as many stakeholders invested in this project and pushing the changes that they think their communities need. There’s a kind of meta debate among people who write and talk about climate. Like, how should we talk about it? Should we talk about it this why, should we talk about it this way? My feeling is like, any story you have is a good one. Any idea you have about it is a good one. Any impulse you have is a good one. So even, Wesley, with your circulars, I’m like yeah, go for it man. Like, I applaud you. It’s not what looks like the most important solution to me, but any impulse— [LAUGHTER] —that anyone has towards this solution— [INTERPOSING VOICES]

jenna wortham

Yeah. Yeah.

wesley morris

Yeah. I mean, I think the thing that I would say about that is that if there is a company that can produce the paper, procure the plastic, put the paper in the plastic, give all the stacks of paper in plastic to a distribution company, and have members of that distribution company throw the plastic bags of paper onto people’s property and they didn’t ask for it, it just seems to me like the biggest F you to all the people like me who are trying to reduce their relationship to this stuff. And so consequently, I feel like calling these people up and just asking them to just please leave me out of this. Like, I’m trying to live this other life over here and you keep trying to implicate me in this other situation. Now I know it’s a folly David, because I have to eat off a plastic spoon when I get a yogurt at the bodega. Like, it’s a whack-a-mole. You hit one gopher and up comes another one.

david wallace-wells

But another way of thinking of it is like, the main issue here is carbon. If we had a national politics or we had global politics that really was focused on reducing carbon, and every product that was produced of any kind was held to that standard, if we can organize that new politics and that new set of regulations, it is actually one thing that we’re worrying about. So if we held every part of our economy, every part of our culture to a carbon standard— and I think we will. I wrote a little bit about this in the book, but I don’t think it’s at all crazy that a few years from now we’re going to start seeing in the supermarket alongside things that are advertised as organic, things that are advertised as carbon free. But what we really need is to have that grass rootsy slash ugly corporate approach met with real policy that—

wesley morris

Holds these countries to account for—

david wallace-wells

Yeah.

wesley morris

—for getting on my nerves.

david wallace-wells

It’s just like, if we just re-prioritized our political systems away from propping up these businesses— many of which are not profitable— to RND, and infrastructure building, and helping those communities who are going to be hit hardest adjust so that they won’t be hit quite as— if we just turn those money from that one category to that second category, at the very least we would be in a much, much better shape. And that doesn’t seem so hard to do. Who wants to subsidize the fossil fuel business aside from the people who run those companies?

wesley morris

I mean, look, none of this feels good. But we thank you for trying to make us feel better about a paralyzing situation.

david wallace-wells

Oh my god, please. You guys are amazing. It’s great to talk to you.

wesley morris

It’s great to talk to you. Good luck with those wildfires. [MUSIC PLAYING] I’m not mad at David. He’s fighting the good fight. And I’m going to do everything he says to do. I’m a voter, I know it’s important. I also feel like I can’t rely entirely on political structures. Even though— this is not to debunk or refute anything—

wesley morris

—that David is talking about. Of course he’s right. But it also doesn’t feel like enough for me. I mean, that’s why I’m out there chasing down the circular guy, because I want to feel like I’m doing something directly.

jenna wortham

No, of course. Of course. And I think that you are literally in the streets, but I also think that a lot of people take to their version of the streets, which is just social media. But they go on social media and they make a lot of noise online to try to effect change. And frankly, not surprisingly, have lost faith in anything that resembles a due process. And Wesley, I also think we live in an era where people feel as empowered or maybe even more empowered by a type of cultural voting system that we’ve rigged together from bubblegum and cat hair. But really from utilizing social currency, and making noise to increase visibility, and signal boosting via tweets, and call outs, and Instagram posts to warrant coverage on let’s say a morning news show, or become a trending topic and then maybe it hits the times front page. And then who knows, it become an HBO documentary. I mean, for better or for worse, that is the way a lot of cultural issues get attention now.

wesley morris

So what you’re talking about basically is not new. It’s not like this just— the hashtag is relatively new in the way we’ve been thinking about direct action. But I mean, protests and the fruits of protest, and that sort of—

jenna wortham

Yeah, letter writing campaigns, all of that.

wesley morris

—activist labor, that’s been around forever.

jenna wortham

Yeah. Of course.

wesley morris

What David is talking about from the standpoint of policy comes right out of environmental activism. The reason that what we’re going through now between these me too cancellations and the mutings of various peoples—

jenna wortham

Mm-hmm, various problematic peoples.

wesley morris

—is satisfying is because it’s so direct.

jenna wortham

Yeah, of course.

wesley morris

Right? You make the right hashtag and you get the right people to stand behind it. Or the cause is so undeniably cause-worthy and outrage worthy that change actually does happen.

wesley morris

And I think that one of the things about this political environment that we’re in is, there’s so much waiting around to be done. It’s basically what I asked David, right? Like, what do I do between voting cycles? I know, mute R. Kelly.

wesley morris

And not to say that calling for the muting of R. Kelly is not a worthy thing to do. But it’s another thing that seems immediately consequential. And I never feel good when I call the distribution company. This process to me feels very circular. And it doesn’t go forward to me, it’s a loop. Like, every Wednesday for me is Groundhog Day. I wake up, it’s Wednesday, I know what’s going to happen when I get home. And every Wednesday I keep hoping the outcome is going to be different. I try different scenarios, I hope that a person answering the phone is going to be a different person. And it’s not. It’s the same.

jenna wortham

You are Natasha Lyonne in Russian Doll.

jenna wortham

But let’s see if we could do something different.

wesley morris

All right, I’ll try David’s way. [PHONE RINGING]

archived recording

You’ve reached the New York City Office of Senator Charles Schumer. Due to a high call volume, we are currently unavailable to take your call. We thank you for your patience and ask that you please try calling again during our normal business hours which are Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Thank you and have a nice day.

jenna wortham

Oh, there’s no—

wesley morris

I think they hung up, there’s no voicemail.

jenna wortham

There’s no option to leave a voicemail.

wesley morris

Listen, we’re trying.

jenna wortham

We’re trying.

jenna wortham

We’ll keep trying.

wesley morris

We’re out here trying, we’re going to keep trying. [MUSIC PLAYING] [OMITTED PER CLIENT REQUEST] We were going to just say to Chuck Schumer, hey, we’re two people who work at the New York Times, but we’re also calling as constituents.

jenna wortham

Yeah, we’re freaked out.

wesley morris

And we want you to do everything you can—

wesley morris

—to fight climate change.

jenna wortham

Make this a priority and do everything you can. Thank you very much, next.

wesley morris

Well, Ariana, just one second. I also was going to ask him if he could do something about those circulars.

jenna wortham

Oh, honey. Oh my god.

wesley morris

I really was. I was just going to ask him.

181 Prompts to Inspire Writing and Discussion

0
181 Prompts to Inspire Writing and Discussion

Every day of the school year, we publish a fresh Student Opinion question. Below are all the 181 questions we asked during the 2018-19 school year (available here as a PDF), divided into two categories — those that easily lend themselves to classroom debate and persuasive writing, and those that are more suitable for creative, personal or reflective writing.

Each question is based on content from The New York Times, and all are still open to comment by students 13 and older. Each linked Times article is also accessible without a digital subscription.

Teachers tell us they use these questions to help students practice writing persuasively; as inspiration for lessons; as jumping-off points for class discussions and debates; or just to encourage student engagement with current events and with other young people from around the world.

For even more ideas on how to use this feature in your classroom, check out our free, on-demand webinar that explores how to use our thousands of writing prompts for everyday low-stakes writing practice across the curriculum.

Smoking Bans Have Saved 15,000 Children’s Lives in Brazil, Imperial Study Shows

0
Smoking Bans Have Saved 15,000 Children’s Lives in Brazil, Imperial Study Shows

Second-hand smoke kills over 880,000 people every year globally, and a quarter of those deaths are among children 14 years or younger. These sobering statistics have helped drive smoking bans in public places in many countries, but these bans still cover just 20% of the world’s population.

A new study led by Dr. Thomas Hone of Imperial College of London’s School of Public Health has strengthened the case for expanding of these measures by examining the effects of public smoking bans on infant and neonatal mortality in Brazil. The results have already caused a stir, with coverage in major Brazilian media outlets like Agência Brasil and Globo.

This research adds to Imperial’s track record of impacting public health debates in countries around the world – and now, students anywhere in the world can be a part of this high-profile work by enrolling in Imperial’s 100% online Global Masters of Public Health program.  

Exposure to second-hand smoke can have significant, lasting health impacts on children. In the womb, second-hand smoke can negatively affect fetal development and increase risks of pre-term birth and low birth weight, and infant exposure can increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), lower respiratory tract infections, and asthma.

Brazil has established itself as a leader in tobacco control internationally, beginning with a 1996 law implementing a partial smoking ban allowing smoking in separate and/or ventilated spaces, which helped reduce smoking prevalence from 34.8% in 1989 to 14.7% in 2013. A comprehensive federal ban took the next step in 2014 by completely prohibiting smoking in all enclosed public places, with no exceptions for separate smoking sections or ventilation (which is often ineffective in preventing second-hand smoke exposure).

Brazil is also a particularly interesting country to study because the national smoking ban was preceded by state-level activity, including 9 states introducing comprehensive smoking bans and 17 states strengthening partial smoking bans. This “natural experiment” helped researchers isolate the impacts of the different types of bans from 2000-2016 using a combination of municipal-level data and telephone surveys.

  • Comprehensive bans were associated with a 5.2% reduction in infant mortality and a 3.4% reduction in neonatal mortality.
  • Partial bans were associated with a 3.3% reduction in infant mortality, but no change in neonatal mortality.

Overall, strengthening smoking bans were estimated to have avoided over 15,000 infant deaths in Brazil, with the majority in the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro owing both to their large populations and early implementation of comprehensive smoking bans. Notably, benefits were also greatest in municipalities with lower educational attainment and higher poverty rates, indicating significant equity benefits of these policies as well.

While this research was led by Imperial College of London’s Dr. Hone, the study was a truly international effort. Co-authors hailed from Brazil’s National Cancer Institute and Ministry of Health and the University of São Paulo, the University of Rotterdam in The Netherlands, the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

This study was published on the World Health Organization’s World No Tobacco Day, and the goals of this research are similarly international. While the risks of second-hand smoke have led to comprehensive smoking bans in many high-income countries, lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have lagged behind – an issue that is often compounded by higher rates of smoking and second-hand smoke exposure.

With one-third of developing countries lagging behind the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 2030 targets for neonatal mortality, this study of the impact of smoking bans in Brazil could thus be an important catalyst for progress in other LMIC contexts around the world. Public health students and professionals aspiring to make similar global impacts can join Imperial through the online Global Masters of Public Health degree.  

 

Imperial College and U.S. Researchers Find Better Food Policies Could Save 230,000 Lives

0
Imperial College and U.S. Researchers Find Better Food Policies Could Save 230,000 Lives

Cardiovascular disease, including heart attacks, strokes, hypertension, and a wide range of other illnesses affecting the heart and blood vessels, is perhaps the biggest public health challenge in the United States. It causes about 800,000 deaths and 6 million hospital admissions every year, and it is a particularly urgent priority for policymakers because it disproportionately impacts lower income groups.

Dietary factors are one of the leading causes of heart disease, and a new study indicates that about 230,000 deaths could be prevented through 2030 in the U.S. with a combination of several specific food policy interventions. The international research team was led by  Dr. Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard of Imperial College London’s School of Public Health, whose new online Global Masters in Public Health degree is making this kind of impact possible for students anywhere in the world.

Researchers used the US IMPACT Food Policy Model and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate several potential policy pathways to reduce U.S. cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence through 2030. Options studied included:

  • 10% tax to increase the costs of sugar-sweetened beverages (i.e. a soda tax)
  • 10% subsidy to reduce the cost of fruits and vegetables
  • 30% subsidy for fruits and vegetables for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients
  • A national mass media campaign aimed at increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables

In terms of overall benefits, the 10% nationwide subsidy on fruits and vegetables had the biggest modeled impact by far, with about 150,500 CVD deaths prevented or postponed by 2030. By comparison, the 30% subsidy for only SNAP recipients would save 35,100 lives, a 10% soda tax would save 31,000 lives, and a one-year mass media campaign would save 25,800 lives. Altogether, a combination of these policies could save 230,000 lives by 2030.

In addition to looking at overall CVD morality, the study also examined the extent to which these approaches reduced the socio-economic disparities in CVD impacts. While the media campaign and the national subsidy and tax policies had no impacts in this regard, the targeted 30% fruit and vegetable subsidy for SNAP recipients (who are, by definition, low-income households) could reduce the disparity of CVD mortality by about 6%.

Thus, while implementing all of these policies could have the best outcome, the study suggests that fiscal strategies to target the price of fruits and vegetables vs sugary beverages would have a much greater impact than public education and awareness strategies. Moreover, it should be possible to shrink the disproportionate burden low-income communities suffer from heart disease by targeting more aggressive subsidies towards these households.

While this research was focused on the U.S. context, it was conducted by a team spanning a number of institutions spread across multiple countries. Co-authors of the report hailing from the eastern side of the Atlantic include Dr. Pearson-Stuttard of Imperial College London as well as researchers from the University of Liverpool and the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.

U.S. institutions were also very well represented, with researchers from Tufts University, the Montefiore Medical Center, Birgham and Women’s Hospital, and the American Heart Association. Collaboration between Imperial College and U.S. researchers is very common; U.S. researchers were the co-authors for nearly 8,000 papers published by Imperial researchers from 2015 to 2017, more than any other country! Additionally, the report drew on support from a grant from the National Institute of Health, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

If you’re interested in making this kind of impact on public health and public policy in the US – or anywhere else in the world – the Global Master of Public Health degree from Imperial College gives you a chance to collaborate globally online and on your schedule from wherever you are.