This word has appeared in 22 articles on NYTimes.com in the past year. Can you use it in a sentence?
Improving College Student Outcomes with Course Policies that Support Autonomy
Cover image by Ulrich from Pixabay
By Megan Sumeracki
In today’s post, I want to share a cool, relatively new paper by Simon Cullen and Daniel Oppenheimer from Science Advances (1). The paper is titled, Choosing to Learn: The Importance of Student Autonomy in Higher Education. The methodology is neat, the results are interesting, and while this paper used a higher education sample, I think educators teaching other grade levels might be able to take something from this (even if not the exact intervention).
The authors (1) note that autonomy enhances student motivation and achievement, yet many policies that are frequently adopted and even recommended by university teaching and learning centers, like mandatory attendance, mandatory drafts, etc., can undermine feelings of autonomy. They went as far as to critically analyze 13 prominent centers for teaching and learning at well-known universities and found that there was very little, if any, discussion or recommendations related to student choice. Some even argued against meaningful student autonomy. The authors argue that autonomy may benefit college students.
The purpose of the studies in the paper was to test whether policies that support student autonomy improve student outcomes. They present two studies. One was a randomized controlled field study examining the effects of allowing students to choose whether their attendance was mandatory. The other was a multi-year cohort study examining the effects of allowing students to opt out of challenging, high-effort assessments.
Today, mandatory attendance.
Study 1: Mandatory vs. Optional Attendance
The Method
This study was a randomized controlled field study testing the effects of allowing students to choose whether to make their own attendance mandatory (i.e., part of their grade). The study was conducted with college students taking a large Gen-Ed Philosophy course at Carnegie Mellon University. Students in the course were enrolled in discussion sections taught by TAs (teaching assistants). Each TA had two discussion sections, one randomly assigned to have a mandatory attendance policy with the other having an optional-mandatory policy. The TAs did not know what the hypothesis for the study was.
In the mandatory attendance sections, the TAs told the students that attendance at recitations would count toward their final grade. They were permitted to miss up to three recitations, and if they missed only three sessions or fewer, they had 3% added to their final grade. If they missed more, they had 3% subtracted from their final grade.
In the optional-mandatory sections, the TAs told the students that they got to choose if you would like attendance at recitations to count toward their final grade. If they chose for it to count, then the policy was applied in the same way as the mandatory policy. They were permitted to miss up to three recitations, and if they missed only three sessions or fewer, they had 3% added to their final grade. If they missed more, they had 3% subtracted from their final grade.
Learning Technology Turkey Awards 2024
Well, hello there. The Turkey Awards are an annual tradition on my blog. For those of you who haven’t had the opportunity to read last year’s awards, click now.
What makes the awards special is that they are completely independent and straightforward, from my honest perspective. Some vendors have blackballed me for listing them as Turkey of the year.
This is a great honor to those vendors. I want to thank your senior executive (reportedly, it went all the way up the food chain, but I never got a clear answer about who made that decision).
For the other vendors, knowing that you read the blog, and the Turkey Award post makes my heartbeat ever so much more.
Award Icons
Here now are my turkey award icons (drumstick roll please)
Winner – Notice the Trophies in the back
Nominee – Running for the win
Category 1
Nominees are:
- Vendors who are telling prospects that their AI is 100% accurate. They note that they use a RAG, have guardrails, and in at least one case, it was built from scratch (not using commercial, nor open source such as Falcon)
- Vendors who state that because it is only the client’s content in the LLM, and nothing else, and their AI can search the content and go right to the area-text that someone asked in a question/answer it is 100% perfect. One vendor noted that not one of their clients has told them that the information was incorrect
- Clients who tell vendors that they do not want any text noting that AI may produce fake or false information
Category 2
Nominees are:
- An inherent flaw of AI are hallucinations – which is fake or false information. It is imperative that a client knows this, and that their learners know this – which can exist if the vendor places the text in the system, whether under every window the learner sees to ask information or elsewhere where a learner can see. Ditto on the admin side, when folks are creating content, etc. It should note that a person should always check/verify the information is correct, before accepting it.
Every vendor can do this. It does not require a lot of work, and the audacity that vendors ignore this is unbelievable. Just because a client knows (if they do) doesn’t mean the learner will know. It is a false premise.
- Because it is your content and only your content then the answer can go right to the text or information that the person asked about – ergo it is always correct, and AI is correct.
It’s not a matter of ‘100% false ‘. The reality is that AI can indeed hallucinate. The fact that it’s your content doesn’t guarantee its accuracy. AI doesn’t discern, ‘Oh, this is their content, so it will always be 100% correct.’ The implications of AI hallucinations are far-reaching and should not be underestimated.
Moreover, the notion that AI, particularly LLMs, is immune to producing fake or false information because it was built from scratch is a fallacy. Vendors who propagate this belief are simply wrong.
Finally, the statement that because nobody is telling us that it is incorrect, it must always be correct follows the mantra of “If-then,” which is false.
First, the learner may not tell the person overseeing the system. Why? They think it is correct.
If I don’t know, why would I contact someone?
The argument that they validated when building it is always correct OR that nobody is saying it is wrong (let’s give them the benefit of the doubt)—what happens when it is incorrect?
And the output of your own content – thus, isn’t accurate. Who is going to take responsibility for this?
I can guarantee you it won’t be the vendor.
It’s important to remember that AI is not immune to bias, even when dealing with user-generated content.
On a side note, if the client asks the vendor to remove the text, that client is not only wrong but also opening themselves up to potential ethical issues (what is the value statement again?) or an impact that will have repercussions down the road.
Will the vendor take responsibility for the client’s error?
Heck no.
Oh, the vendor is supposed to be the expert here rather than the client.
Who wants to get into legal issues – if this impact is a big failure?
Think that way.
Category 3
Back to AI – What are you talking about?
The Nominees are
- LLM agonistic – 100% false statement. Currently not doable. Yet there are vendors who say they are. Seriously, are you reading about AI or just winging it?
- Their authoring tool (I say content creator) for creating a course in AI is something you have never seen before. I have only seen one tool that applies to, and that vendor, created another which is the basic content creator using AI. The latter – which is the most common will output the worst content someone has ever seen. This is not designed to WOW your learners to come back over and over again (even if it is assigned).
Rather it is to publish quickly. Why don’t you skip that and just upload a Crayola cartoon book?
- Ungodly number of vendors who are using AI going with OpenAI.
This opens up these vendors to a “What if OpenAI shutters down?”
“What if OpenAI is no longer the leader (I’d argue they are not the leader in Generative AI)?
There are vendors who state they can easily swap out from say OpenAI to another LLM – but that shouldn’t be the driver here.
The landscape of LLMs is shifting, with open-source models rapidly catching up to their commercial counterparts.
To such an extent, some will argue they match them.
I believe that open source LLMs will by the end of 2025, surpass many commercial LLMs.
Finally, and thankfully, there are vendors who are leveraging the potential of Bedrock or similar MaaS (model as a service).
And the winner is LLM Agnostic. Not possible today. A year from now or two, who knows? AI is rapidly improving.
Category 4
Learning Tech Jargon – That nobody understands
The Nominees are
- Upload SCORM that appears on the admin side of a lot of vendors
That is the text – ignoring that the people on the admin side, may not be from L&D or Training. How will someone from marketing understand this? IT? You have to be kidding me. HR? What planet are you on? HRIS – which are increasingly getting the learning system or learning tech turned over to them, after L&D is gutted or the head of it, and the department itself is eliminated (this is a global problem).
A way to resolve this? Upload content – today most people upload videos, pdfs, and other. Sure, if they have a 3rd party authoring tool, they are creating a course in it – but I’m pretty confident that after “training” the vendor provides they will show them that content upload can be from their system.
One other important note – upload SCORM is vague. If I created a course using SCORM 2004 3rd edition, it will not work in a system that says SCORM.
There is no backward compatibility. Ditto if you purchase 3rd party published content – which you will connect to anyway – but an important fyi.
If the client has created content with AICC, it won’t work with SCORM from the standpoint of no tracking, and potential other issues.
Ditto on the reversal, in this case SCORM doesn’t work with AICC.
Lastly if the client created content and wrapped it with xAPI – where do they put that in your system if you list SCORM?
It is rare to find someone who actually knows what SCORM stands for. Remember that not everyone knows what you are talking about. Make it simple and universal.
- Calling your system something other than an LMS, learning platform, even LXP.
I get the latest, such as a Talent Development system/platform and sales enablement.
However, regarding the latter, SEP, nobody knows what that is unless those who are knowledgeable and are seeking a Sales Enablement Platform.
However, calling your system a bizarro things such as workforce development system, employee development system, or training management (and not knowing that it means that the heavy core is managing training from a scheduling and resource standpoint—no courses are in it).
When I searched for SEP on Bing, I was met with a barrage of financial SEPs, not a single Sales Enablement Platform in sight.
My disappointment continued when I searched for Sales Enablement Platforms on Bing, only to find that the results were not what I was looking for. The term’ Sales Enablement Platform’ seems to be used for everything but actual sales training platforms.
No worries, I bounced over to G2, which vendors rave about for showing the best.
The top listings were not sales enablement for training systems.
They included HubSpot Sales and a variety of others that were all over the map, including content management.
Hey, they have an AI bot—let’s ask G2’s AI bot which is the best for sales training. I’m expecting systems.
Only one was an actual system.
The others? Were selling sales training programs and an AI tool more suited to coaching with AI.
I also asked the bot, “What are the best systems for sales training?”
Guess what? I got the same list as before.
The point here is that saying SEP is jargon.
Saying Sales Enablement Platform goes all over the map.
Saying the Sales Training system isn’t any better.
I’m not a fan of saying “Sales Training System” because you get stuff that isn’t accurate.
Sales Enablement Platform and adding text for sales training and learning will aid.
Nothing is perfect here because any learning system can provide sales training.
After all, it is the content you create or buy to achieve that.
The quality?
That’s in your hands.
- EdTech – and you are in the corporate segment. Edtech means educational technology. Now, that word, educational should make it pretty clear, who is the target audience? It is education BTW. I taught at a university and was fully aware of what EdTech meant. Yet I see systems targeting the corporate market and only the corporate market, calling themselves EdTech. I saw it once at a trade show, with the words, “Best EdTech System.” The vendor was 100% focused on customer training.
The key item here is that a lot of people have no idea what EdTech means let alone what is educational technology. If you have to explain it, then that should be clue that you have an issue.
And the winner is SCORM. Congrats for the confusion. Who’s up for Tin Can or IEEE?
Category 5
Turkey of the Year Award – Learning Systems
This is the category a lot of people zero in on. Is it totally subjective? Absolutely – it is based on my viewing of the system(s). In the past, SuccessFactors was a multi-winner, but not this year. The folks there seem to have had an issue with my award. Which wasn’t a factor here and although I had to go through another channel to see the system – thank you my source – I still think the system is underwhelming – but safe – for this year.
The Nominees are
- Workday Learning – A past winner. Can they repeat? Their whole new AI thing is an utter joke. It goes not only in WL but elsewhere. The system has been in the past ignored at their yearly show. Not this year. I am befuddled on why anybody would buy this turkey. My guess is the pitch tied around you having other Workday modules, and thus the platform and it is easier to connect and work.
That should not be the reason.
Sell them on how great it is, not that staying within the WD family is easy.
However you land on this baby for your learning, there are far better systems for employees that work well with Workday.
If you’re considering using this system for external training, it’s important to note that it’s not designed for that purpose.
This is not the system that is focused on that segment.
I shouldn’t say shame on you; how is that extra yearly payment for such a wonderful system designed for internal audiences?
- Continu – They get a lot of buzz for their system, but what I saw wasn’t that enthralling, especially around a few areas
a. They have icons for their content, one of which is a camcorder. A camcorder for video.
They told me that nobody has told them that is a problem, and they can figure it out.
Uh, it is a camcorder for video. What’s next, a VCR?
b. Another icon was a lightning bolt.
I couldn’t figure out what it meant.
And I can’t recall what it was tied to.
Their statement that nobody has ever said anything about the icons doesn’t mean much.
Training 101 always uses icons to create a how-to guide or similar.
A light bulb means tip or something similar, a stop sign means stop, etc.
Plus, if you see a red stop sign without the words, you may be in another country, not know the language, and recognize it as stopping—even if people are not stopping.
c. They were the vendor who stated that because they built their own LLM, it is 100% accurate.
They added that this is due to them using the data that’s “definitely in the system.”
Remember that AI flaw?
It still applies here. Just because a system is built on data, it doesn’t mean it’s infallible.
There can still be errors and biases in the data that the AI learns from.
The fact that they are telling me it is 100% accurate is a concern because I wonder if they are telling prospects the same thing?
I should note that if a client removes all their content from the LLM due to fake or false information or concerns around it and adds new content and their data into the LLM, believing it will now be 100% correct, be aware that some remnants from your previous content will remain in the LLM.
Surprise!
- LinkedIn Learning – The system is more of a giant why – because the majority of buyers from what I can gather and from vendors who have LL content tell me – people are purchasing the content. I surmise if you are big enough, they might toss it in. I know this has happened with other systems where the content is the money maker – although if they can sell the system to you, why not? As folks know I am not a fan of LL content. Plus, for the longest time they had an issue with Workday capturing the data of the learner on the LL content, as in they couldn’t. Ooops.
I was going to add a vendor who continues to sell their system, even though the finances are beyond terrible, including an overseer to handle the finances. Once a wonderful system, today? An electrical board that your mom says, “do not play with it, and then you think about doing so.”
And the winner is Continu
They are really nice people, and I was really looking forward to seeing the system.
Thus, seeing what I saw, was an unbelievable disappointment. I thought about the movie the Poseidon Adventure or Earthquake starring the great George Kennedy.
The first was a classic, the second was like the remake of Twisters – the original was awful too.
Next time, I need to find my camcorder.
Because I sense a Twister is coming
for my video.
Until next year, Gobble, Gobble, Gobble!
Our 15+ Skill Paths Prepare You for Cloud, Cyber, & IT Certifications
Here’s an epic opportunity for anyone considering a career in cloud, cybersecurity, or IT: We just added over 15 new skill paths to our catalog that are designed to prepare you for top industry-recognized certification exams.
Certifications carry a lot of weight in these tech fields, because they validate your knowledge of specific skills and open the door to lucrative and rewarding careers. Surveys show that having industry certifications can increase job opportunities, salaries, and chances for bonuses and promotions. Not to mention, professional certifications tend to be more accessible to obtain than, say, a degree from a traditional four-year institution.
Our test prep courses prepare you for some of the most popular certifications, including CompTIA A+ 220-1101 (Core 1), AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02, and Cisco Certified Network Associate 200-301. The best part? Test prep skill paths are fully included in your Codecademy subscription, so you can focus on learning the relevant skills without racking up additional costs.
Read on to learn more about how to start working towards a certification in cybersecurity, cloud, or IT today.
Who are these new skill paths for?
If you’re interested in an IT, cybersecurity, or cloud career, you’re going to want to have certifications. In Skillsoft’s most recent IT Skills & Salary Report, 90% of leaders said they want to hire professionals with technical certifications. These skill paths are an excellent way to learn exactly what’s covered in certification exams, so you can feel confident and prepared when it’s time to sit for the real exam.
The cool thing about IT, cloud, and cybersecurity certificates is that they help level the playing field in the competitive job market. Career changers or folks with unconventional educational backgrounds can earn certifications to signal to employers that they have the practical, hands-on skills needed to handle a specific domain.
There’s also value in getting certified even if you’re in a non-technical or tech-adjacent role. Certifications can help you improve your cloud literacy, become self-sufficient with basic IT tasks
There are no prerequisites for these courses, but you should have an idea of what you want to do or which certificate you’d like to pursue before jumping in. It also helps to have some basic programming knowledge, an understanding of automation, and strong soft skills. Read this blog to learn how to choose the right certification based on your goals and experience.
What can you learn in the new skill paths?
The skill paths are made up of video-based courses as well as bonus material like skill benchmarks that are designed to mimic actual certification exams. You’ll also find interactive projects in these skill paths, so you can test your knowledge and get hands-on experience applying concepts to real-world scenarios. For example, in the CompTIA IT Fundamentals+ skill path, you’ll complete relevant projects like manually installing Windows 10, creating and configuring a Linux virtual machine, and backing up and restoring a database. All of these features help you feel confident and prepared when it comes time to sit for a certification exam or tackle real-world challenges.
Good to know: You can’t get certified through Codecademy courses alone, but they will provide you with a structured learning experience that prepares you for the exams. Since this is all included in your Codecademy Pro and Plus membership, you don’t have to pay extra for exam prep resources. (However, when you eventually sign up to take the certification exam itself through a credentialing organization, you’ll have to pay a fee that can cost a couple hundred dollars.)
If you decide to take the next step and get certified, you have to purchase vouchers from vendors in order to take the official certification exam. Depending on the certification, it can cost hundreds of dollars simply to take the test. Our courses are the perfect opportunity to explore these domains before you commit the time and money to getting certified.
Which skill path should I take first?
Ultimately, choosing the right skill path and certification for you depends on your individual career goals. Take some time to research what these different careers entail before deciding. We have tons of resources on the blog that will educate you about these fields, for example, a guide to in-demand cybersecurity roles, a list of cloud careers and salaries, and a breakdown of the biggest misconceptions about working in IT.
If you’re just getting started, check out this blog about how to choose a beginner-friendly industry certification and the skill paths that will get across the finish line.
How to Choose the Right Industry Certification for Your Goals
Earning industry certifications is one of the most productive ways you can work towards a career in IT, cloud, or cybersecurity. Certifications validate your skills and experience, so you can expand your career opportunities, have better job security, and earn more money.
With our new test prep skill paths, we’re making it easier for Codecademy learners to get ready to ace certification exams and break into this lucrative area of tech. There over 15 new test prep skill paths that ladder up to leading industry certifications, and they’re all included in your Codecademy membership.
Not sure where to start? Like choosing a programming language, you should have an idea of what you’d like to do before selecting a certification or skill path. Ahead we’ll break down what you should look for in a certification, the best ones for beginners, and the skill paths to take now.
Research providers and vendors
The names of industry certifications can be confusing to decipher without context (even for someone who can read complicated computer code). Often, you’ll see the provider or platform, level, specialization, and alphanumeric exam code baked into the certification name. Take a look at some examples of industry certifications
- AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Associate SAA-C03
- CompTIA Security+ SY0-701
- CompTIA IT Fundamentals+ FC0-U61
Before you dive into a skill path or certification, consider which platform or provider is the most relevant to your goals, career, or industry. For example, the big three cloud providers, Amazon Web Services, Azure, and Google, all offer their own certifications. If your organization primarily uses Azure, that’s a good reason to choose to specialize in Azure. Or say you’re looking for a job in finance — you may want to focus on AWS, which tends to be a popular choice for banks and financial institutions.
Some other credentialing organizations that you’ll come across in our catalog include CompTIA (the Computing Technology Industry Association), a non-profit trade association that provides vendor-neutral IT certifications, and Cisco, which is known for its networking hardware like routers and switches, as well as cybersecurity solutions.
Do a little research to determine which route is right for your goals. Our new skill paths align with industry certifications, so once you choose a cert, it’s easy to tell where to start.
Evaluate your level
There’s a huge range of levels when it comes to industry certifications — from absolute beginner to expert. When you’re just starting out, you’ll want to focus on foundational certifications before doubling down on a specific topic or technology.
As with all areas of tech, you’re never really done learning in IT. Just like you gradually learn more programming languages or frameworks throughout your coding career, you’ll also pick up more certifications and skills. Some certifications, like the AWS Certified Solutions Architect, are intended for people who have a couple years of hands-on experience working with cloud architecture.
Even seasoned technologists have to stay on top of current technologies and skills and continue earning certifications. For instance, Google Cloud’s Professional Cloud Architect certification is one of the highest-paying IT certifications in the US. The average certification-holder has 9 certifications, according to data from Skillsoft’s IT Skills & Salary Report, one of the largest studies of IT salaries, skills, and certifications.
Consider the salary potential
Certifications boost your qualifications for higher-paying jobs. They validate your skills, making you more productive and valuable to employers, who see certified employees as key to reducing troubleshooting time and closing skills gaps within the organization.
Depending on where you are in your career, the earning potential of specific certifications might be a big factor in which certification you decide to pursue next. The highest-paying certifications that we offer test prep skill paths for are Certified Cloud Security Professional (CCSP), Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), and CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+). To put the value of these certifications in perspective, the average CISSP holder in the US has a salary of $168,060, according to the 2024 IT Skills & Salary report.
Remember: IT professionals usually have multiple certifications that contribute to their compensation. There are also other factors that impact salaries beyond credentials, like your geographic location, industry, job tasks, and your individual performance.
Start pursuing industry certifications
If you’re starting from scratch, our beginner-friendly test prep skill paths [link to landing page] are a solid way to kick off your learning journey. Here’s what you need to know about the entry-level certifications, the types of jobs you can get with the certs, and the test prep skill paths to take:
CompTIA IT Fundamentals+ (FC0-U61)
CompTIA IT Fundamentals+ (FC0-U61): Specifically designed for beginners and career switchers, this certification validates your understanding of basic IT concepts, including computer hardware, software applications, networking basics, and cybersecurity principles. If you want to see if IT is right for you, start with this skill path. It’s also a great option for people in tech-adjacent roles who want to upskill.
Best for: Anyone interested in IT as well as tech-adjacent upskillers and students.
CompTIA A+ Core 1 (220-1101)
CompTIA A+ Core 1 (220-1101): This is the industry-standard entry-level certification for people who want to break into IT. Our skill path prepares you for CompTIA A+ certification with expert training in hardware, OS, networking, security, and troubleshooting to help you get in the door in IT.
Best for: Job seekers looking for a role as a Technical Support Specialist, IT Support Technician, or Field Service Technician.
AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner (CLF-C02)
AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner (CLF-C02): Get up to speed on AWS Cloud, services, and terminologies with this introductory-level certification. Master AWS Cloud fundamentals, security, and migration strategies. This skill path prepares you for the AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner exam (CLF-C02). Good to know: This is the most widely held AWS certification, according to new data from the IT Skills & Salary Report.
Best for: Cloud curious people and upskillers who want to improve their cloud literacy.
Microsoft Certified Azure Fundamentals (AZ-900):
Microsoft Certified Azure Fundamentals (AZ-900): Get introduced to cloud services and how they’re provided with Microsoft Azure. Explore cloud concepts, core Azure Services, Azure pricing and support, and the fundamentals of cloud security, privacy, compliance, and trust. This skill path prepares you for the AZ-900: Microsoft Azure Fundamentals certification exam.
Best for: Tech professionals (like Software Developers or Database Managers) who want to learn cloud concepts and gain Azure experience.
Taking the first step toward industry certifications can open doors to exciting and rewarding career opportunities. By following these beginner-friendly test prep skill paths, you’ll gain the foundational knowledge and confidence needed to advance in the IT field. Don’t forget to check out our full catalog of IT, cybersecurity, and cloud courses that can complement your learning journey. Embrace these learning opportunities to build a strong base for your future professional endeavors.
World’s Top Notch ISO 9001, ISO 45001, ISO 14001 Courses, Now Available in Spanish
Exciting news for Spanish-speaking professionals around the globe: Alison is now offering its highly acclaimed ISO 9001, ISO 45001, and ISO 14001 courses in Spanish. Led by expert instructor S.M. Waqas Imam, these courses have already attracted over 550,000 learners in their English versions. The Spanish translations aim to break language barriers, making high-quality education in quality management, occupational health and safety, and environmental management more accessible than ever to Spanish-speaking communities.
Why ISO Certifications Matter
ISO certifications are globally recognised standards that help organisations ensure their products and services meet customer and regulatory requirements. These standards improve management systems and enhance operational efficiency. Let’s take a closer look at the three key certifications now available in Spanish on Alison:
1. ISO 9001 (Quality Management)
- Overview: ISO 9001 is the world’s most popular quality management standard. It helps organizations consistently meet customer expectations and regulatory requirements while focusing on improving overall efficiency.
- Course Features: Alison’s popular ISO 9001 course, designed by expert S.M. Waqas Imam, delves into the core principles of quality management, including the process approach and the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. What sets this course apart is its focus on demystifying complex concepts like risk-based thinking and organisational knowledge alongside essential QMS (Quality Management System) topics. By enrolling, learners will gain a comprehensive understanding of the steps necessary to implement and sustain a robust quality management system.
- Enrollment Impact: With over 190,000 enrollments in English and now expanding to the Spanish version, the total impact of this course is set to grow significantly. The Spanish version aims to reach and empower even more professionals worldwide.
2. ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety)
- Overview: ISO 45001 sets the standard for occupational health and safety management systems. It helps organizations improve employee safety, reduce workplace risks, and create better, safer working conditions.
- Course Features: This course, thoughtfully designed by S.M. Waqas Imam, guides learners through essential concepts of occupational health and safety, including risk assessment and hazard identification. Moreover, it comprehensively covers all aspects necessary to understand and implement effective occupational health and safety management systems.
- Enrollment Impact: With over 250,000 enrollments in its English version, this course has made a unique impact worldwide. Now available in Spanish, it is set to further benefit Spanish-speaking audiences by significantly contributing to the creation of safer workplaces across the globe.
3. ISO 14001 (Environmental Management)
- Overview: ISO 14001 focuses on environmental management systems. It enables organizations to minimize their environmental impact and comply with relevant regulations.
- Course Features: Alison’s ISO 14001 course, led by S.M. Waqas Imam, offers an in-depth exploration of environmental management principles with a strong emphasis on sustainability. The course also covers the steps to implement an effective environmental management system. Learners will gain valuable skills to identify and manage environmental risks and opportunities.
- Enrollment Impact: With over 110,000 enrollments in its English version, the release of the Spanish edition presents an excellent opportunity for Spanish-speaking learners. It will deepen the understanding of thousands, fostering the adoption of sustainable practices across diverse industries.
Why Choose Alison?
Alison is a trusted name in online education and offers free and accessible courses to millions of learners worldwide. Alison’s ISO courses are designed by industry experts like S.M. Waqas Imam and provide practical knowledge. The skills gained through this course can be applied in real-world scenarios.
Here why you should choose Alison for your ISO certification training:
- Expertly Designed Courses: Each course is crafted by professionals with extensive experience in their respective fields, ensuring you receive the most relevant and up-to-date information.
- Flexible Learning: Study at your own pace and access the courses anytime, anywhere. This flexibility makes it easier for working professionals to enhance their skills without disrupting their schedules.
- Free Access: Alison offers these courses for free, making high-quality education accessible to everyone without any financial risk. Optional certification is available for a fee, allowing learners to showcase their achievements to employers and peers. If you decide the coursework isn’t for you, simply enjoy the learning experience without any obligation to purchase a certificate.
Expanding Opportunities for Spanish-Speakers
Making these ISO courses available in Spanish marks a significant step towards inclusivity and global reach. Spanish-speaking professionals can now access Alison’s world-class ISO certification training for free, gaining essential knowledge and credentials in the top three ISO management system standards. This valuable training empowers them to excel in their careers and drive success within their organisations.
Whether you aim to enhance your quality management skills with ISO 9001, improve workplace safety with ISO 45001, or adopt sustainable practices with ISO 14001, Alison’s newly translated courses in Spanish, led by S.M. Waqas Imam, present an invaluable opportunity. With impressive enrolment numbers already, the addition of these Spanish versions is set to expand their impact even further. Take the first step towards achieving excellence in your field—join the growing community of ISO-certified professionals today.
Visit Alison.com to enroll in these courses and start your journey towards professional growth and success.
Have You Ever Gone Hunting? Would You Ever Want to?
A small cohort of turkey hunters wants more people to understand the beauty and challenge of hunting for your supper. What are your thoughts on hunting?
House, Trees, Sky
Tell us a story, real or made up, that is inspired by this image.
Word of the Day: complacent
This word has appeared in 143 articles on NYTimes.com in the past year. Can you use it in a sentence?
Is It Ethical for Teachers to Use A.I. to Grade Papers?
Many schools do not allow students to use artificial intelligence to complete their assignments. Should teachers be held to the same standard?
