fbpx
Home Blog Page 1300

Spaced Practice for Skill Learning

0
Spaced Practice for Skill Learning

By Cindy Nebel

Psychologists often breakdown memory into different types. Long-term memory can be divided into two different types: explicit memories and implicit memories. Explicit memories are memories for events and facts. They are memories that we can easily think and talk about. Implicit memories are a bit different. Implicit memories include procedural (muscle) memories as well as some other types of automatic processing.

The primary focus of most of the things on our site is the acquisition and retention of factual information, which would fall into the explicit memory category. When we talk about spaced practice, we often talk about studying in small sessions over the course of time instead of studying in one long session.

Sometimes when we talk about the six strategies for effective learning, we get a little push-back from educators who state that they don’t want their students to simply memorize information, but to understand it. Thankfully, the six strategies do promote understanding. We also sometimes hear that we are talking about learning facts, but that is not useful in other areas, such as art. But again, we’ve talked about the usefulness of the strategies in lots of other subjects (and even for dressage!).

Today I want to talk a little bit more about how we can use one of the strategies, spaced practice, to improve learning of implicit memories – of skills. While teaching a course on Learning last week, I told the students about a classic study showing that spacing works not only for explicit learning, but also for skill learning. Here is that study:

Baddeley and Longman (1) trained postal workers on a new typing task that sorted mail. At the time, this was a very practical matter. Going from hand sorting to mechanical sorting would require training up to 10,000 new postal workers, so doing this in the most efficient way was key. They started out by training 72 workers in sessions that were either 1 or 2 hours long, either 1 or 2 times/day until all of the groups had worked on the training for 60 hours. So the group who training for 1 hour 1 time/day had trained for 60 days, but the group that trained for 2 hours 2 times/day had only trained for 12 days. Note that each group received the same amount of training and that they were paid the same amount to do that training.

Below, you can see the results of part of that study. This shows the number of hours that it took for each group to learn the new typing skill. Those that practiced for 1 hour once/day took considerably fewer hours to learn the new skill than did those who practiced for 2 hours twice/day. In fact, the fastest person in the latter group took 2 hours longer than the slowest person in the former group.

Reaching Through the Wall

0
Reaching Through the Wall

Note for Teachers: Join our Feb. 6 free webinar on teaching with New York Times-inspired writing prompts. Sign up here.

_________

What story could this image tell?

Use your imagination to write the opening of a short story or poem inspired by this illustration.

Post it in the comments, then read the related article to find out what this image is all about.

Find many more ways to use our Picture Prompt feature in this lesson plan.

Word + Quiz: savant

0
Word + Quiz: savant

Note: Our Sixth Annual 15-Second Vocabulary Video Challenge is underway. It will run until Feb. 18.

: someone who has been admitted to membership in a scholarly field

_________

The word savant has appeared in 59 articles on NYTimes.com in the past year, including on Jan. 9 in “Train Your Brain Like a Memory Champion” by Bryan Clark:

In training like a memory champion, it’s really the visual that’s most important. Each technique we covered capitalizes on the ability to visualize memories rather than simply attempting to recall them. This, as our team of experts notes, is an exercise in futility.

There’s nothing, physiologically speaking, separating memory athletes from people who forget where their keys are or can’t remember what they had for breakfast this morning. The difference is in the training methods, and the time spent in mastering them.

“Overall, I’d say you definitely don’t need to be a savant to have a great memory,” Mr. Mullen said. “If you’re sincerely engaged with a few tricks up your sleeve, you might surprise yourself.”

Weekly News Quiz for Students: Venezuela, Peace Deal, Oscar Nominations

0
Weekly News Quiz for Students: Venezuela, Peace Deal, Oscar Nominations

How well did you follow the news this past week? How many of these 10 questions can you get right?

Will You Be Watching the Super Bowl This Year?

0
Will You Be Watching the Super Bowl This Year?

Note for Teachers: Join our Feb. 6 free webinar on teaching with New York Times-inspired writing prompts. Sign up here.

_________

Are you a football fan? Will you be watching the Super Bowl this Sunday?

If you are a fan, who do you think will win? Why?

If you’re not, is there anything you enjoy about Super Bowl Sunday, whether it’s the Puppy Bowl, the halftime show, the advertisements or even just the snacks?

In “Super Bowl LIII Will Have a Young Coach, an Old Coach and a Lot of Things in Between,” Victor Mather writes about the story lines for Sunday’s game. Here are some of them:

Not every Super Bowl is super, and we’ll find out if this year’s edition fits the tag on Feb. 3. But we do know some of what is in store.

One of those things is (no surprise) the New England Patriots, who will be appearing in their third consecutive Super Bowl and fourth in five years. The Rams will be the first team to represent Los Angeles in the game since 1984.

Those are not the only records and oddities about Super Bowl LIII.

Game of Ages

Sean McVay, who took over the Rams last season after a meteoric rise as an N.F.L. assistant, turns 33 this week, which will make him the youngest head coach in Super Bowl history. He breaks the record held by Mike Tomlin, who was 36 when his Pittsburgh Steelers won the big game in 2009.

At 66, Bill Belichick will not be the oldest Super Bowl coach, as Marv Levy went to the game with the Bills at age 67 and 68. But Belichick could become the oldest winner, breaking the record held by Tom Coughlin, who was 65 when the Giants beat the Patriots in 2012.

Game of Ages II

Tom Brady is 41 and will become the oldest Super Bowl starting quarterback. He breaks the record set by, well, Tom Brady last year.

At 24, Jared Goff is not the youngest Super Bowl starter, but he’s not far off. Dan Marino was the youngest, at 23 years 127 days, and Ben Roethlisberger was just behind him at 23 years 340 days.

By the Number

The Roman numerals have reached LIII, or 53. You could also call it Super Bowl 110101 if you prefer binary numbers or Super Bowl 35 if hexadecimal is more your thing.

It’s the first prime-number Super Bowl since XLVII (Ravens over 49ers, 34-31.)

Among the athletes who have worn No. 53: Don Drysdale, Harry Carson, Artis Gilmore and Darryl Dawkins.

Diversion

Pop band Maroon 5 and rappers Big Boi and Travis Scott will perform the halftime show. Up with People, which headlined the show four times, is still awaiting its first appearance since 1986.

Gladys Knight will sing the national anthem, a year after Pink did the honors. Knight will join an odd mix of stars to carry out the duties, a list that includes Lady Gaga (2016), Billy Joel (1989 and 2007), Cher (1999), Kathie Lee Gifford (1995) and Al Hirt (1970).

Gamblers are saying the anthem performance will last 1 minute 50 seconds. You can bet on it. Or on whether a player will kneel (5-1 against). Or if a fan runs on the field (15-1). Or the color of Adam Levine of Maroon 5’s shirt (Black is the favorite) or whether a Coke or Pepsi commercial will appear first, or — well, you get the idea.

Students, read the entire article, then tell us:

— Are you planning to watch Super Bowl LIII? If so, what are you most looking forward to — the game, the commercials, the parties or the halftime show? If not, why not?

— If you’re a football fan, what do you think of the matchup of the Los Angeles Rams and the New England Patriots? Who are you rooting for? Who do you think will win? What do you think will be the final score? Which players do you think will stand out and why?

— Of the narratives outlined in the article, which story line is most compelling to you and why?

— What do you think about the choice for this season’s Super Bowl halftime performers? If you could see anyone perform at the Super Bowl, whom would you want to see, and why?

How Much Do You Know About Mexico?

0
How Much Do You Know About Mexico?

Can you find Mexico on a map? What else do you know about this Latin American country with 126 million people.

Learning System Award Winners 2019

0
Learning System Award Winners 2019

If you were in the nineties here in the states, and had a postal address, you likely received the Publisher’s Clearinghouse sweepstakes.  I know I did. And every time I got it, I dreamed that a scratch card here for more choices, scratch card there – “What even more drawings?”, I knew this would be the year.   I mean it said no purchase necessary, but come on, deep down you have to buy one crummy magazine, because wink wink, that’s your ticket in.

And so you and millions of your fellow human beings mailed it in.  And waited. 

Well, wait no more.   Ed McMahon is not back (he’s dead after all), but in his honor, and without you having to buy an overpriced magazine,  I present you with early award winners in various learning system categories, for 2019. 

But first…

What is a Learning System?

Because of the size of the market and split out of types of systems, it made sense to create an umbrella term and then place the main four types of systems under said umbrella.  

Hence, learning systems.   The biggest market in size and scope are LMSs (Learning Management Systems).  LCMSs are not LMSs, nor do they see themselves as one, just an fyi.   The second market in size are LEP/LXPs – Learning Engagement Platforms/Learning Experience Platforms.  The third market are learning platforms – these are folks who have many of the standards, include training/learning components, but are not an LMS (and often are more streamlined).  A training management system for example, would slide under learning platforms, same as a training operations system.  Knowledge Reinforcement systems?  Learning Platforms. 

The fourth category are what I call, Other.   Yes, very original I know.   In this category, you will find Performance Mgt or Talent Mgt systems with a learning/training component or module.  These systems do not see learning/training as number on in their solutions, and usually go with a module approach.   Sales Enablement Platforms which have a training and/or learning component – now slide into this category. A coaching system which incorporate training/learning modality, fits here.

The Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019

The official rankings, report and posts will happen in January of 2019.  I will let you know that all 50 of them will be in FindAnLMS.com, assuring that the best of the best can be found in one central location – for you to contact them, schedule demos, send RFPs and more.    Actually, as of today, 48 of them are in the system, with the last two arriving by Jan, 1, 2019.

However, since the holidays are nearly upon us (I mean you might be reading this for the first time in late Dec.),  I’d like to announce who are in the Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019.   They have not been notified yet, so it is like finding out the PCH winner is based in neverheardofyou small town, planet earth.

Type of Learning System will be noted.   Methodology will be coming in the post with the final rankings, and breakdowns.

In no particular order, but for folks wondering what type of learning system they are, the first group are in the LMS market

  • eLogic, Growth Engineering, Litmos by SAP, CrossKnowledge Learning Suite, MATRIX, Kokm, Roundtable Learning, SumTotal Learning Management, Cornerstone Learn, GyrusAim Learning Cloud, Tessello, Agylia
  • Unicorn LMS, Upside LMS, IMC Learning Suite, Torch LMS, glo Learn
  • Spoke, Eurekos, Thought Industries, Schoox, LMS 365, Instancy On Demand Learning Platform
  • Fuse, Workday Learning, LearnUpon, BizLibrary LMS, Create LMS, Talent LMS, eXact LCMS, Kallidus Learn, Accord LMS
  • Docebo, Asentia LMS, Syfadis Experience, Saba, G-Cube, Brainier LMS, Persona Learning Management, SkyPrep, Blackboard (Corp version), 

LEP/LXP market

  • Learn Amp, Percipio by Skillsoft, Degreed, TILE by Toolwire, EdCast LXP and Knowledge Cloud, Coorpacademy LEP, 360Learning, Looop, Springest Go

After seeing the latest version of Saba and talking to execs, and the recent acquisition of Lumesse with me:time too, Saba returns to the Top 50. 

I can state that two LEP/LXPs are in the 2019 Top 10 Learning Systems, err 11. Because for the first time ever, a tie at #10. Here they are in no particular order (sorry, you will have to wait for final rankings in Jan).

  • eLogic, Litmos by SAP, Growth Engineering, SumTotal Learning Management, Coorpacademy, Unicorn LMS, Docebo, CrossKnowledge Learning Suite, Fuse and Learn Amp and Brainier LMS.

 

uwin

Early Award Winners in various categories

Folks always ask me who is the best in gamification or extended enterprise.  Who is NexGen? (already announced, but will re-announce here)  What about mobile?  True NetFlix like experience?  Fun for the whole family – err fun for learners?  Edtech?  My vertical in Software or Retail or Dog snacks?

Because these breakouts could go longer than an Oscar speech, the majority will be the category followed by the vendor. In a couple of cases, #2 and #3 may be mentioned.  When * is seen, this indicates that the vendor is in FindAnLMS. 

I will bring back our favorite announcer, ED…. Mc…Marley!

CWGDEd McMarley

“Salutations! Big night here. Big night. I know you are waiting with anticipation, so envelopes, please!!!”

“And the winner is….”

K-6 (Education) – Frog Learn  .  Simply, the best K-6 LMS on the market.  Not even close.

6-12 or you want the K-12 whole package –  Schoology   Very slick and strong system for the education.

Higher Education – “and the nominees are….

  • Blackboard Learn,  D2L, NEO LMS

“And the winner is…”   NEO LMS *. Go with the “Enterprise edition”, which yeah, I agree is not a term that is used or should be used in the education market, this is the edition that the win is tied too.

Award Winners

greenie

Best Learning System for Gamification –   There were plenty to select from this year, but in the end it came down to three systems, one is Coorpacademy an LEP, who offers battles as part of their gamification, Gameffective, strong in gamification, and Growth Engineering which is an LMS wrapped around gamification (but quite robust).  GE also has battles, games and the usage of Knowledge Arcade. 

“And the winner is..”

Growth Engineering*.  As the Iron Chief would say, “Reigns supreme”.  

Best Learning System for Social Engagement  – Fuse*

Best Learning System for mobile –  Edapp aka Ed*.

Best NetFlix like experience –  Yes, many say they are – but are they really? Sure, none offer recommended content that you would never take, because they either made it themselves or it is “Cookies made of meat,” which besides sounding disgusting, isn’t something I’d watch.  Anyway..

“And the winner is…” – Coorpacademy *  Their site does not do the product justice.  Workday Learning was a close second.

Best LEP/LXP for 2019 – Learn Amp *

#1 NexGen LMS for 2018-19 – Litmos by SAP *.   Fuse and Cornerstone were neck and neck for #2 and #3.

Best LMS for Extended Enterprise – eLogic *.  Unlimited tenants (no additional charge), same with skinning each tenant too. Robust e-commerce, robust platform period.  I’ve seen the roadmap, and can tell you, this behemoth feature rich system is on track for even bigger things.

Best LMS for Compliance and Regulatory – Cobent! Wait..They were acquired a long time ago, and their new owners are not as strong, so nope, Cobent you are out.

SumTotal Learning Management * takes home the prize.   Unicorn LMS * a very good LMS rumbled in at #2. 

Top Three LMSs when budget is extremely tight and you still want a very solid system.  I could call this most affordable LMS category.  I focused on mid-size numbers i.e. 6000 end users tied to affordability.  Features had to be a min. of 70% of my LMS RFP Template. 

  • Talent LMS *  – Very affordable, Solid system.
  • BizLibrary * – you get a lot for a very good price point
  • UpsideLMS *  – You get a lot for the price. 

I had Bridge LMS a very close fourth, and Abara LMS *finishing off at #5.  Again, this is based on 6,000 user base. 

Why 6,000?  Some vendors go with a price range, and thus a 5,000 might slide into a range of a vendor going up to 5,999.  6,000 tends to slide into a completely different price range, than one at 5,000.   Anyway, that was my approach to pricing.

Verticals!  Verticals!

These are vendors who score high in certain verticals.   Not every vertical is listed, because there are so many of them (verticals) that is. 

#1 LMS for Financial Services – Unicorn LMS.*  If you are in FS, this is the system to select. 

#1 LMS for Consumer Goods – Spoke *

#1 LMS for Retail – eLogic *

#1 LMS for Technology (Software) – Litmos by SAP *

#1 LMS for Manufacturing – SumTotal Learning Management * . Saba was #2. For Cornerstone fans, finished in the top five.

The Following Categories will be announced in Jan. as part of the Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019

  • Enterprise
  • B2B/B2C  (External only)
  • Innovation (new category)
  • Associations
  • Hospitality
  • Non-Profit
  • Government
  • Content with the system (new category) – Means the system comes with content that is no cost to you.
  • Content and Learning Tech marketplace – Which vendor has the best marketplace for content and learningtech?
  • Analytics –  What is the best system for robust analytics, data with forward-thinking type of analytics?  You will find out here.  Interesting to note, the winner and runner-ups all have an LRS.  Wait, all that were in this category, have an LRS
  • Best Learning System for Coaching (new category)
  • Best Learning System for AI/Machine Learning (new category)

Bottom Line

If you did not want to buy a magazine, but wanted to enter Publishers Sweepstakes, all you had to do was find an index card with a specific size followed by rules of doing it this way, not that way, before mailing it off.

It was irksome. 

Good thing the early award winners here and top 50 noted above, require none of those things.

Well, maybe

an index card.

E-Learning 24/7

Upcoming post – Percipio by Skillsoft Product Review with screenshots too!

 

 

 

 

2018 Turkey Awards for E-Learning

0
2018 Turkey Awards for E-Learning

I have the most important shirt of the past four decades.  The shirt that announced on that terrible day, the turkey drop of WKRP in Cincinnati.  Who can forget the live feed of Les describing the ill-fated promotion.   If you have forgotten, no worries – here it is

 

While Ben Franklin was turning over in his grave (he wanted the Turkey as our national bird), others were fleeing for their lives.

I get it.

Eating a turkey is one thing, watching its attempt to fly is another, but winning a turkey award is something entirely different. 

Award Insight

Winning a Turkey Award I think is right up there with winning an Oscar if said Oscar is for “what the heck.. or ” huh?”.   It should be a badge of honor, I mean not everyone is in the running here, and its just a select few per category.   I know some of you will disagree with the nominees, perhaps feeling that your company or vendor should be in there, and I totally respect that.

This is why, in the comments section, you can list your own nominees for Turkey Award of the People, then a vote will take place (not valid in Florida – I mean its been what 18 yrs and you still haven’t invested in new voting machines).  Please refrain from naming people’s names or folks you just despise.  In other words, don’t include me in your nominations. 

Categories

Web Conferencing  – There are some really good ones out there this year. They have to be paying services and not the free ones.   Otherwise Blue Button would win hands down. 

Learning Systems that need an update or several aka “Let’s not party like its 1999”.   Pretty self-explanatory, although I still can’t understand why that seems to be a challenge.  I mean if a turkey can wear tennis shoes, why can’t you update your system?

FunctionalityTotally in learning systems here.  Some functionality are just turkeys.  Pardoning options do not apply.

Terms used in the industry –  I surmise that are turkey retiree places, where you know they are safe from consumption and live out there days, gobbling around, chilling with the weeds and doing whatever turkeys do when they are bored.   These terms should be retired. Feel free to hang out with Timmy, he likes to run at the sound of a dinner bell.

Award Icons

fleeturkeyRepresents Nominees

 turkeywinner – Turkey Award Winner

Category 1

Web Conferencing

A sound crop (you thought I would say something else – admit it) of choices this fine year.  Finalists were based on the quality of call on average (based on the number of times I was on a call with this tool – used by various vendors showing me their products or having a briefing, etc.).   Extra points for freeze ups, lags and bring you in as “mute” so when you talk, no one knows, not even you. 

fleeturkey

GoToMeeting –  You have only been around for a long, long time and yet you still seem to be stuck in the “pre-mute you” approach.  I as only one voice, hate that.   I think others do as well, they just can’t tell you, because they are on mute.   UI/UX needs a serious overhaul.

join.me Recording should come as a standard with this tool.  I mean, there are freebies out there that can have more than five folks on, and record automatically (join.me at their Lite version – recording is not included).   Another needs a UI/UX update. 

Blackboard Collaborate  I actually liked this when it first came out, but since then I have heard from folks who use it, that well, it isn’t as great as it could be, let alone good.  Shame really. 

Turkey drum roll please…

turkeywinner GoTo Meeting.  Funny story, years ago, I had a web conference call with the folks from GTM and during the call, the video froze and people got kicked off the call.  Not a good sign.  Anyway, it’s better now, but still the controls are not intuitive as much as they should be, and Zoom is far superior, even though they haven’t been in the market as long as GoToMeeting. 

Category 2

Let’s not party like its 1999

I understand that cost is building/adding/enhancing or downright removing is pricey.  This is why I looked at vendors who I know have the cash flow and deep pockets.  So there really isn’t any excuse.

fleeturkey

OLM  I sometimes get folks who ask me about Oracle’s Enterprise LMS, better known as OLM.  After a brief chuckle (I’m kidding here),  I let them know that this system is not good – this is just an example of a system that needs a major revamp. 

Anyone remember those old Oracle CDs they gave you for training?  I think I used them for Frisbee practice.  You can buy so many systems that integrate well with Oracle, so why stay in-house with their own platform?  No, seriously, I’m asking why.

SuccessFactors Yes they have some very good functionality, but the system as a whole is a major letdown.  I mean Plateau was really garbage and then SF took it over and made it way better.   Then, the updates while they kept coming, seemed to be just “eh.”  I get that SAP sees SF as an HCM (the product was initially ideal for recruiting, as I recall), but it is pitched to large companies as this amazing offering which includes learning.   I should note that the SAP LMS (which as one exec years ago told me, is like a toss-in for folks who want to stick with SAP), is even worse.    

This is one reason why if I was SAP, I’d strip out some things with SF, place those extras as a mod for Litmos by SAP customers so that Litmos is your only LMS. 

SucessFactors has a good chance of being a repeated winner.  Turkey wings crossed.

Canvas by Instructure –  There is plenty to like in this LMS for HigherEd and K-12, and while they are strong of the functionality, they are weak IMO with the whole UX for educators who are the ones adding the content, courses, etc.   Students I can see how they would like it, but I wouldn’t buy this platform if I was in the K-6 crowd (Frog wins hands-down as the best LMS for K-6). 

For me, it needs better capabilities on the admin side and as with other HE platforms out there the authoring tool that comes with it focuses the whole synchronous angle – which you know, is not the way to build an effective SBL, let alone an engaging course.

turkeywinnerSuccessFactors.   I know I couldn’t believe it myself.  I mean after I got the envelope out of Cali’s mouth  (named after Baja California), and was able to see thru the chew marks, I just had to let folks know.   I will say it once more SAP, let Litmos be your primary system and not this, wait for it, turkey.

Category 3

Functionality

As a vendor in the learning system space, you need to constantly evolve. Offer new functionality and capabilities beyond the standards that exist (what I define as min. standard functionality).      That isn’t to say, you dump standards like a learning path – which is a must for any system,  but there are functions that should be tossed on the heap like COP (remember communities of practice in the mid-2000’s? I still try to forget).

fleeturkey

Chat Rooms –  I am excited to announce that same vendors in the space have put this one out to pasture. However, the majority have not.   Let’s see you offer a web conferencing integration or maybe you have one; so that should take care easily of a text-based chat room.  How old are text chat rooms?  I built a website in 1994 for teachers and uh, it had a text-based chat room, and a forum discussion board too.   I say no more.

Forum/Discussion board –  This is another feature that not even cranberry sauce should save.  Outdated.  If you are wanting features of the soon to be Gen Z and yes the millennials, then this is not one of them.  Go voice messaging or video boards or heck anything that is not an actual I read what you wrote, then I respond, then the teacher or instructor responds back thing.   Better yet, go with a robust coaching/ask an expert component (the best way to resolve this old-school method).

Are you seeing a trend here?  Hmm.. why..it is in social

Facebook like design with a wall for streams etc. –   I mean honestly, who wants to be Facebook right now (excluding the $$$$ coming in).  Privacy issues? Check. Subterfuge going on inside the company to deny, even when they knew the fake articles existed? Check.  Those same millennials leaving the system in droves? Check.  Yeah, let’s stay with this amazing approach to social.  I guess MySpace was unavailable?

turkeywinnerForum/Discussion boards.   Another retro classic from the mid 90’s, popular with higher education and education systems.  Mixed with corporate (i.e. some folks love it, others do not).  As they say, a turkey dressed up for Halloween is still a turkey with silly clothing and a pirate eye patch.  BTW, ever tried to use a forum/discussion board on a mobile device?  It’s not pretty.

Category 4

Terms in e-learning that Need to be Retired

fleeturkey

micro-learning –  Enough already.  Please realize that every system on the planet can have micro-learning courses.  You could have had a micro-learning course in 1998.  I had a few in 2000.  In other words, it has been around forever..  So, why do you ask is it such a hot term?  Marketing 101.  Vendors, who pitch they are a micro-learning platform, sometimes have courses/content longer than five minutes?  And as noted way back when, micro means nothing, since e-learning is based on the learner’s learning style and length it takes to comprehend, retain and synthesis.  What takes you three minutes to watch, may take someone else 30 minutes, because they are watching snippets and repeating.   In other words, micro isn’t micro for everyone. 

Social Learning The term was originally devised based on two components, a – learning, b – social media.   Yep, that’s right, that is how social learning the term came about.  Now its morphed into what you see today (which overall isn’t that awesome), but it has some opportunities to change that.  A better term to use in the 21st century (2018 and beyond)? Social Engagement.   Let’s make the switch today and move social learning to the wonderful “Whatever happened to…” group.

Training Management Systems –  What exactly are these?  It is one thing to be a training operations system (which does exist and I can see how folks who seek one, would use one), but the TMS angle, is sort of a hodgepodge.   Some TMSs are really LMSs, but refuse to use the name, because you know, they are not an LMS.  Other TMSs pitch themselves either as ideal for B2B or for folks who want to manage training, which uh, is why an LMS was created in the first place and of which, you can do B2B/B2C as well (if the vendor offers e-commerce and multi-tenant).    I firmly believe we as an industry come up with way too many terms to describe essentially four different types of learning systems.  Thus, the consumer gets confused.  And so do many others too.

turkeywinner Social Learning.   Yes, a stunner.  I know many of you were thinking, “micro, it’s going to be micro,” sorry to disappoint.   

Again, time to change to Social Engagement which is more apropos.

Bottom Line

runturkey

Let’s recap the Turkey Award Winners for 2018

  • Web Conferencing – GoToMeeting 
  • Let’s not party like it’s 1999 – SuccessFactors
  • Functionality – Forum/Discussion Boards
  • Terms in e-learning that Need to be Retired – Social Learning.

Congrats to each of the nominees and of course to the winners.  Not everyone gets to be a turkey.  Some end up as a chicken or tofurkey.  I mean the options are endless.

Just ask Honey Ham.

(Happy Thanksgiving Everyone!)

E-Learning 24/7

There will be no blog post next week.   However, I am conducting a survey on the learning system space, content and mobile too.   Results to be published in the blog in Dec. You will make an important role, so please take a few minutes (avg time is just under three minutes) to complete this quick survey

 

 

 

 

 

Scenario Based Learning, The Time is NOW

0
Scenario Based Learning, The Time is NOW

It’s An Amazing Course..it is an awful course

Right now, someone is looking at the same course as you on Coursera or Udemy.  They are either thinking this is great or this is garbage.  And guess, what you are thinking the same thing.   Wow! This is great.   OR Wow, this is awful and I bought this?

Data backs up that folks either like online learning or do not like it.  There isn’t really a mid ground towards it, especially so in higher education.  

Higher Education Can Change the Narrative

I’d love to believe that if any content could be developed effectively, educationally sound and utilizing various design methods it would be in the higher ed space.

Sadly, as a whole it is not even there.   While there is a movement in edtech to change the narrative of online courses to that of skills focused, rather than theory; what hasn’t be touched is the method and mechanism, which I argue is where the focus first must go.

One of the key reasons folks in this new narrative of having higher ed go with skills based learning and not what they are doing today (and have since the 17th century) of theory and practical or just theory; is that in the world that exists now, businesses need individuals with skills in-hand ready to go.

But, when you look at academia you will see overwhelmingly the courses are synchronous based – but in corporate asynchronous based appears 90% plus.  Thus, it would make more sense to first, change the course design to asynch to align more with corporate.  I mean, sorry, but learning a skill with synchronous based design just is a big fail. 

The  hands-on approach just won’t work with Synchronous based.  So, I am calling for a new approach. 

And no it is not micro-learning.

Scenario Based Learning for HigherEd 

I have used SBL for decades and can tell you that it works in education, higher education and corporate.

Here are the steps to creating a scenario based learning course.  It should be asynchronous based – because we are creating a scenario here, and you can do this with any authoring tool on the market.

Couple of Key Points of SBL

First it can be in micro-format.   I had one built with four mini modules, each 10 min in length if someone was to go linear. They could jump around to each mod if they so choose to do so.  Could someone zing thru each mod in five minutes, sure, but as with anything it depends on their learning style (of of the reasons I am not a fan of duration mentions with courses, it totally depends on the person’s learning style, plus it ONLINE).

Second, it will take a bit more time to create the first one.   I say this because it requires you or whomever is building the course to identify the variables that need to be in each scenario. This isn’t a “let’s just put some text on this screen, with a graphic or video OR in this is a video here and …”  –  That is the old way of building courses and let me tell you on behalf of all learners – it is boring, and trust me when I say this, its a factor on why people do the click-click-click approach to taking your course.

Once you get the hang of developing and building SBLs you will start to ask yourself, “why didn’t I do this before?”

The cool part of an SBL course is it takes that information that you wan folks to takeaway and says okay, I am going to offer a set of knowledge and skill development in a fun, engaging and interactive way.  I am going to do away with “theory” only.  I am going to do away with “subjective assessment,” and I am going to do away with ILT modality via online delivery.

Higher Ed Approach for SBL

  1. Identify the real world situation you wish to place the student in (For example, let’s use MassComm)
  2. Identify all the variables that will produce a series of outcomes with that situation.

For example, let’s say the topic was covering cable and tv programming and the scenario was that folks would need to create a weekly schedule for their tv channel. 

Thus, a group of “fictitious series” were created – title, brief description, along with audience data.    Series were all types, dramas, comedies reality tv, thrillers, etc.  Each student’s tv station is provided with a “budget” and information about that station – perhaps it was an independent station, thus it could buy up syndicated programming whereas a network affiliate had to include network programming as part of their channel.   

3.  One section in that module or even it as a course itself, is the information data points you want folks to learn and retain.   Then the next chapter or page is the scenario.  In one scenario, they have an option to buy programming that are sitcoms.  The best ones are really expensive, syndicated top titles are very pricey, and then there are newbies that run the gamut.  The student clicks on each of the “programming titles” which could even show a snippet of video if you so choose, clicks an either yes or no or “buy or “decline” and the program appears in their box or area or cart.    

Another scenario is a programming lineup.  So the student, using their mouse selects the show and moves it to the time period.  They will have been provided in a previous page or pages, the info on the pros/cons of time periods and with the info they learned on the ratings and other metrics, now will be able to incorporate that info into this one scenario.

Are we talking skills?

You bet we are.  This is skill development, building, growing and expanding in a fun way.  And it is way better than an assessment which tells you only that a person memorizes or guesses well. 

I can’t think of one student who enjoys reading text in a textbook.   Or listening to a monotone professor espouse their regurgitation of information that has zero baring on real life (past or present).   Tell me about the “New World” with European settlers, and have my scenario be a boat whereas I have to decide where to land and then what do I need to do to survive, and in return I will get a sense of what it was like for those coming to this “New World”.

Explain using various pages or a page of two on the 100 Years War, then create a scenario where I choose to be a Lancaster or York.  Follow it up with a situation that as a Lancaster I have to face, in comparison to a York.  Is there common ground for us?  And if yes, what are the issues we can agree on?  If not, there is continuation of war.   For an added twist, Richard shows up, and offers one of the Lancasters (the student) to switch sides.   Does it work? 

Here I am extracting information about the past, and bringing it into the present via skill building, but still using the past as the scenario.    

If you are teaching about Cubism, then provide the key takeaways or knowledge points for people to learn about.  Next, have a screen where folks get to use their mouse and select various designs to start their canvas.   On another scenario, they meet various Cubist artists – ask them questions and the artist responds.  Maybe add the ability to web cam or record the question and the artist is another student or you (the teacher) playing that character already recorded into the course.

Corporate SBL

I have had enormous success with Scenario Based Learning.  It can be used with any subject that exists in the corporate market.  You say it can’t be done with non-profit?  I say it can (and has).  You say it can’t be done in Finance?  Yep, it can.   You say, no way for Shipping?  Yep, it can.   You say impossible for retail, I say not only yes, but YES.

You say it can’t be achieved for compliance.  I say, it can and it can be 10000 times better than anything that is out there, if you take the time to build it or have someone else build it.  

Whenever I hear about skill building, I expect to see content (online learning courses) to be utilizing scenario based learning.  And each time, I walk away disappointed.  If you have a new employee who needs to learn about various folks in the department or where to go to get this or that.   Provide the info in knowledge points and then follow it with a scenario.  

They are placed into real world, as in let’s say two weeks from their start date.  They use their mouse to select a person and ask them a series of questions – to which that person responds.  You could record the audio of that person and add it to the course.  If you are going pure video – you can do SBL.

And you do not need a production studio to do it.  Take out your smartphone, and record various situations around the office.  Role play if you need – after all you are running Training or L&D.  Then add the info for the knowledge points – it can appear as an overlay on the video or at certain point.  The learner clicks on this or that, and now they enter a scenario based on that certain point.

Guess what?  Skill building.

Oh and higher retention.

Here is what you need

Elmer’s glue – the kind you tasted as a kid to see if had a flavor.   No, no I’m kidding on the glue, unless that is something you still do. 

1. Creativity –  We all have it.   I know it is in you.  Maybe a chocolate bar helps.

2. Topic –  What are you going to cover?  Each SBL is based on only one topic and then

3. Knowledge Points  – These are the big takeaways from this topic.  I never go more than five.  If you cannot extract five “big ticket items” as we say, then go back and cull it down.   Frankly, four is ideal.  Three will work.  Anything less, tells me to dump that topic.

4. Scenarios – What will they be?  Can you incorporate all the knowledge points into one giant scenario, whereas the person will go into it, needing to have at least a baseline of some information on each knowledge point?  When you create an SBL, you want to have at least one “everything is in” scenario – this is the best way to enable folks to learn what they are learning and applying it.   But, you still include one scenario per section. 

I am learning how to deal with customers.  I am given an option of types of customers – happy, somewhat happy or angry.  Surprise, I get angry (everyone does because the scenario is about dealing with an angry customer).  In this section or mod or whatever you wish to call it, the topic is on how to diffuse a situation with a return  (notice how specific I got here?  You need to as well).  

I provide the leaner with a knowledge point – one point in this case – let’s say communication  The scenario afterwards has me using my mouse and my character changes clicks on various questions and then the customer responds.  I wish to expand that, so maybe my “employee” can select options for eye contact and the customer responds accordingly.  

Then the cycle is repeated with a new knowledge point.

Build It

Your SBL will have

a. Table of Contents  – Even if your “duration” is five minutes – you will still have a TOC. I’ve had it done with my mini mods before using SBL and it works just fine

b.  People can move around as much and often as they want.  Someone wants to jump right to the scenario, let them.  They are likely not going to go far.  

c. Go Topic-Page (Knowledge Point) – Scenario – Page – Scenario 

d.  Each page should have some level of engagement – even if it is just a mentor character popping up and helping out. 

e.  Each Scenario has to have the variables that are tied to the knowledge point.  Scenarios should be real life, real world.   For example, you can create an SBL just for managers dealing with lazy employees.    Who are your SMEs to help?  Why.. the managers!  Ignore what you can read on the net, and ask folks what are the challenges you face with laziness.

f.  Ask folks who are similar in the course.  This means, if your SBL is about new employees and clocking in; you talk to some new employees, asking them what challenges they faced or concerns, and so forth.  Ask folks that have been then no more than two months  (four weeks is better, of course), not Steve who has been then six years.    Find out the correct procedure for clocking in, now create an SBL form that.

You are changing the dynamics of the SME.  They become much more of the course or content, whereas we would usually use them for the information and then takeaway pieces from it, now you are adding their actual “experience” in that real life situation as part of the whole new way of this type of content.

Because every experience is different or can be, you incorporate that into your SBL.

Bottom Line

Scenario Based Learning is more than ever needed.   Just think what an SBL on Civility would look like.  Or one of acceptance of different ideas or opinions. 

OR one on handling criticism.

OR learning Excel or Sales or Pick/Pack in a warehouse and so forth.

The vendors who build 3rd party content can help here.  They can actually follow this SBL approach, and stop with the text driven, static or semi-static experience. 

Knowledge Reinforcement can move from just text or a video to an interactive role whereas everyone plays a part.  

Short. Right to the Point.

And Real

World.

E-Learning 24/7

Speaking of real world – I am presenting at the Litmos Corporate Virtual Summit (7/8th of Nov) (Register here for FREE) Craig_FB

 

 

 

 

 

Can you recommend an LMS?

0
Can you recommend an LMS?

Perhaps you have to someone you know.  Or maybe you have posted this same question on various social media platforms such as Linkedin.

Or you have seen it posted someone on the internet.  I know I have.  Seen it that is.  In the past couple of months, this question is making the rounds on Linkedin with the usual responses that follow.

a. Vendors saying “have you looked at XYZ” (which is their system)

b.  Consumers saying “We like ZYX” (and some of the consumers are resellers, so again it is more of pointing towards..

The problem with asking random folks to recommend an LMS is that they have no idea on what specific functionality you need, nor your budget, nor your challenges or issues you are facing, nor your requirements, nor your training approach or L&D approach, nor your experience with e-learning.

And therein lies the problem.  Just asking to recommend an LMS without the audience knowing exactly what you want is like following the mantra of saying can you recommend me a movie to go see, without telling people you hate dramas, comedies and documentaries.  The responses could include all of those options.

I often receive inquiries from folks asking what LMS do I recommend, with the same approach they post on Linkedin.  In other words, it is just the question with no particulars of what is taking place.

I often bring up FindAnLMS, my search and comparison platform for finding learning systems, including LMSs, simply because I have been told by many people looking for or researching LMSs that they like it and use it. 

In the amount of time you read this line, you could be registered and using the system.   So, before you go ahead and post, can you recommend an LMS, I’d say go to FindAnLMS.com, register, activate and then log-in to conduct your search.

But this post isn’t about FindAnLMS, it is about the question can you recommend an LMS.  And the answer is yes, yes I can.

Recommendations

While I am still working on my Top 50 learning systems for 2019 (published in Jan., plus all the vendors will be found in FindAnLMS),  I do have systems I can recommend based on various criteria.   As with the report (yes, there will be on in 2019), my criteria may not align to what you are specifically seeking. 

Thus, I will try my best to differentiate when it comes to various factors.  I also weigh support as an important piece of the puzzle, and it is because the number one reason people leave systems is due to support issues.  Yet, as I have often noted, it is rarely pushed upon in an RFP, let alone a demo.   Folks seem fine with the vendor noting how awesome their support is, without extracting any metrics or verifiable data.  

But I do.  And I ask it often when talking to vendors.  I’ve seen many a metric and viewed details that you the consumer would not have access to.  I always appreciate vendors exposing this, because it puts them on the hot seat, but, for those who really care about you, doing it actually helps in the end.

I have asked vendors to complete a Support Card, and many have.  But plenty still have not, which makes me ask why.  You the consumer can use the support card as part of your RFP process, which I strongly recommend.  

I’ve provided you with the questions you want to ask, now, you have the vendor respond.   Anyone who tells you it is a secret, should go from your list of potentials.    Anyone who says they do not have the metrics – trust me – there is someone there who does OR they can compile based on what is needed.

Who is impressing in Support

I know SumTotal Learning Management gets tagged regularly when it comes to support.  And I know folks who leave them are usually unhappy for various reasons, but I can tell you that I have had two in-depth meetings with SumTotal including one with the VP of Customer Service/Support and have seen the metrics.  I appreciated their honesty in saying they still have challenges, but they are trying to correct the ship.   I like that.

They have by far the best mobile app for Support, i.e. a support mobile app that clients can download and use (if they have SumTotal).

What is provided to the client are right to the point metrics, status updates, follow-ups and more.  While the jargon will confuse some folks (I recommended some changes) and there are some items I do not see of value to the client (and noted that to them), the support app is of itself, as a whole, well done. 

So I want to give a shout-out to SumTotal for not only recognizing the challenges they face, but doing something about it and backing that up with data, not just words.

Who Else?

Unicorn LMS, ideal for the financial services space and even anyone looking for an LMS targeting compliance and regulatory, provided their Support Card.  They have terrific support and yep, a training department (rare in our industry).  

eLogic Learning, a top notch LMS, has fantastic support  (also sent a Support Card).  I’d say, in the top three of the entire industry.  It is that good, and they also have a training department. 

Other top support card respondents included ePath Learning, Upside LMS, Digits Glo, MATRIX, and G-Cube.

Who Didn’t

I admit I was surprised that Cornerstone Learning Suite, Saba, Blackboard, Bridge, SuccessFactors, Linkedin Learning and even Docebo did not.  The first two often pitch how their support is outstanding, even though I have heard quite a different story (from consumers and from within). 

Extracting information from SuccessFactors is like trying to extract moon rocks from the moon in a spaceship made out of clay.

Cornerstone has in the past provided me support info for my reports, and that is appreciated, but the support card is a call to arms, of saying we want metrics!

Docebo, a system I do like, has a mixed track record when it comes to support. Saba the same thing.  In fact, I’d say that most vendors in the learning system space would be rated average in their support.  That should be a concern and a wake-up call. 

Functionality

If you are looking for an LMS that has NexGen functionality, well, my previous post on the NexGen Grid, should be the place for you to check out.

But let’s say you wanted a top system because you plan to do a lot of instructor led training and add some webinars to the mix.

In the industry the functionality you are seeking is called classroom management (only for ILT) and event management (for webinars, seminars, etc.).  

One feature that I believe is important is the ability for folks who sign-up/register for an event, and it appears in their own G-Mail, Outlook, or whatever service their e-mail is hosted on.  The way this is done is via iCal (you do not see this). 

You would think everyone has this capability, but you would be wrong.   Cornerstone for example, does not, even though it is a robust LMS.

But when you look at administration, especially with “Allow administrators to set multiple levels of approval (e.g., no approval needed, supervisor approval, instructor approval, etc.)”, Cornerstone does, and the majority of vendors do as well.  But again here is the kicker, not everyone. 

Recommending yet?

I was debating with myself (totally one-sided conversation), how to go about it.  Do I provide based on vertical(s) or the total package or NexGen (see the Grid), or social or gamification or….

Overall Yummy

Without showing my hand (you can’t see it anyway, unless you have telepathic capabilities or are looking at me via a hack with my web cam), for top rankings in 2019, I can list a group that I would say to anyone who asks the randomness without providing specifics, a group of folks.  

If you are a vendor who is not on this list, it does not mean that you are a)not in my rankings for 2019.  Please be aware this is a list only for LMSs, but my 2019 rankings are based on all types of learning systems, so you can expect to see LEP/LXP, Sales Enablement, etc. in there.

The way I went about this, is honestly, just thinking it thru, on the whole banana. There is no perfect system – I want to stress this.  But many people will say to me, “We can’t find a vendor who does this…  Or we looked and no one can do this…”, to which I often respond, there are X who can.

No Particular Order (For those who do not want to say “yummy” in their twitter feeds, feel free to say “Recommends”).  If the vendor is in FindAnLMS, I will indicate as (Yes).  Please note this is only for LMSs and not any other learning system. 

For vendors in FindAnLMS, please register for FindAnLMS, then go in and check out their functionality, etc.  Let them know you found them via FindAnLMS. Many have videos and PDFs you can view and download. And many you can schedule a demo, send RFP, etc.

A couple more that I like, but are missing items such as e-commerce (i.e. they target internal – employees) or UI needs an update.

  • Kokm  (Yes) – Internal targeted.
  • Roundtable Learning (Yes), needs a couple of tweaks, but still someone to explore
  • OnPoint Digital (Yes) – Robust is an understatement, UI could be better.

You would rather want to be on the Titanic

Simply speaking, these three have landed on the “DO NOT RECOMMEND” list

  • Grovo – over-rated – yeah it is more of a micro-learning platform, but it is my post, so I’m adding them here. 
  • SuccessFactors –  Part of me thinks they are so driven to be an HCM, they forgot about keeping the learning strong; the other part thinks that the system is not only over-rated but just poor.  In other words, you can do better.
  • ExpertusOne – Once a darling of mine, but now, not sure of the direction of the company nor the product.  A shame, really. 

Bottom Line

The next time someone asks “Can you recommend an LMS”, you can retort with a firm YES and start to name a few. Send them over to FindAnLMS or to this post or just give them the names and let them search and discover.

The key though is discovery.

The rest

is a

Cool journey.

E-Learning 24/7

Bonus note –  A doggie named Ariel was shot and left for dead.  She needs on-going medical care.  She is now at an animal shelter we volunteer at, so if you can make a donation of even $10, it will make a huge difference.  She lost her leg in the process but is a tough and sweet cookie.  Here is the link to the page. gofundmeI am hoping that the training, L&D, HR and e-learning communities can make it happen for her.  We are on our way, with close to $500 raised.