fbpx
Home Blog Page 1407

THANK YOU to our guest bloggers from 2017!

0
THANK YOU to our guest bloggers from 2017!

We’re right in the middle of a season where a lot of us are giving thanks and reflecting on the year we have had. For some of us it is because of American or Canadian Thanksgiving, Japanese Labour Thanksgiving, or Turkish National Day of Thanks, or upcoming holidays such as Hanukkah, Christmas, or Kwanzaa. For some of us, it is simply because the year is coming to a close and we are getting ready to celebrate a new year. In light of this, we wanted to take a moment (or, a blog post!) to thank the guest bloggers who generously donated their time to make this blog such a success in its second year.

In chronological order of first post, we would like to thank the following people who contributed guest blogs in 2017:

Blake Harvard, a high school AP Psychology teacher at James Clemens High School in Madison, AL., who contributed posts on Ignorance Isn’t Bliss – It’s Bias and Disconnect in the Classroom

Dr. Amber Walraven, is an Assistant Professor at the Radboud Graduate School of Education (Radboud Docenten Academie), who contributed a post on Teaching Teachers That Research Matters.

Dawn Cox, a secondary teacher in Essex, England, who contributed a post on Strategies for Effective Learning.

Dr. Logan Fiorella, an Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Georgia, who contributed a post on Multimedia Learning.

Samuel Sumeracki, staff at the School of Professional Studies at Brown University and a strategic communication expert, who contributed a post on Learning About Current Events and the role of social media in it.

Ashley Bazin, a student at Rhode Island College majoring in psychology and minoring in French, who contributed a post outlining her implemetation of effective learning strategies in tutoring.

Mary Kathryn Cancilliere, a clinical psychology graduate student at the University of Rhode Island, who contributed a post on Attention.

Sarah Lummis, a Psychology major at Goucher College, who contributed a post on Stereotype Thread.

Alyssa DeYesso, a student at University of Massachusetts at Lowell studying Psychology, Disability, and Education, who contributed a weekly digest on Tools for Neurodivergent Brains.

Ray Newins, a Psychology and Criminal Justice major at Washburn University, and is the Program Manager at the Boys and Girls Club of Topeka Indian Creek Location, who contributed a post on brain training and whether it works.

Ulrich Boser, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, who we interviewed about writing, science, and science communication.

Naomi Hennah, a Teacher of Science/Chemistry at Northampton School for Boys, who contributed a 2-part gues blog post on Putting the Learning Scientists’ Work into Practice (Part 1 and Part 2).

Leila Viss, a user of innovative, tech-savvy lesson plans to develop lifetime pianists at her independent, creative-based piano studio, who contributed a post on research-based Practice Strategies for Musicians.

Dr. Sara Fulmer, the Teaching and Learning Assessment Specialist at Wellesley College, who contributed posts on Manipulatives and why they can hinder learning and on sharing learning outcomes with students as well as a weekly digest on Preparing a Learning-Focused Syllabus.

Josh Kurzweil, is an expert in experiential learning, reflective practice, and instructional design, who contributed a post on Supporting Science of Learning in the Language Classroom.

Dr. Stacey R. Finkelstein, an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Zicklin College of Business, Baruch College, City University New York, who contributed a post on SMART Feedback.

Bella Abdurachmanov, a writing instructor and educational writer, who contributed a post on How to Think about Thinking – Metacognition in the Classroom.

Brianna V. Poole, is a graduate from Rhode Island College, who contributed a post on exam study tips.

Oliver Caviglioli, a former special-school head of many years, who later on in his career turned to visualization, who contributed a post on Dual Coding to Support Inclusion.

Danielle E. Jennings, received her B.S. in developmental psychology from Plymouth State University ’16, and is a master’s student in psychology at Rhode Island College, who contributed a post on the role of smell for memory.

Jessica Mokler, graduated Cum Laude from Rhode Island College in May, where she majored in psychology, who contributed A Student’s Guide to Conquering Exams.

Dr. Althea Kaminske, an Assistant Professor at St. Bonaventure University and now one of the Learning Scientists, too, who contributed posts on Two Examples Are Better Than One and a post on Technology in the Classroom.

Tim van der Zee, has a position funded by CEL (Centre of Education and Learning) in the Netherlands, a collaboration between the universities of Leiden, Delft, and Rotterdam, who contributed posts on Guidelines for Designing Edcuational Videos and Why You Should Be a Sceptical Science Consumer.

Jemma Sherwood, is a Head of Mathematics in a Secondary School in England, who contributed a post on Building Effective Learning Strategies into a Mathematics Curriculum.

Dr. Ian Kelleher, the co-author of Neuroteach: Brain Science and the Future of Education, who contributed a post on How to Shift a School Towards Better Homework.

Dr. Marianne Fallon, an Associate Professor of Psychological Science at Central Connecticut State University and has taught undergraduate Research Methods (among other things) for over 10 years, who contributed a post on WOOP – a self-regulation strategy and a post on Putting the Six Strategies for Effective Learning Into Practice.

Dr. Virginia Clinton, an Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations and Research at the University of North Dakota, who contributed a post on Elaborative Interrogation.

Holly Shapiro, the Founder and Director of Ravinia Reading Center, the only reading clinic on Earth owned and staffed entirely by speech-language pathologists, who contributed a post on her Journey from Mayhem to Morphology.

Prof Annette Taylor, has been a member of the USD faculty since 1990. She teaches courses in introductory psychology, research methods and cognitive psychology, who contributed a post on How to Help Students Overcome Misconceptions.

Dr. Debra G. Holzberg, a visiting professor and research associate at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, who contributed a post on Postsecondary Transition for Students with Disabilities.

Rich James, a Human Resources Program Coordinator, for Columbus State Community College, who has specialized in faculty development and workplace learning, who contributed a post on What Does It Take for Students to Exchange Bad Study Habits for Good.

Chris Hilliard, the Second in Science and Associate Assistant Principle at Halewood Academy in Knowsley, England, and his colleague Tom Gilbertson, who contributed a post on Integrating Effective Strategies for Learning into a School Curriculum.

Dr. Lauren Bellaera, Director of Research and Impact at The Brilliant Club, a charity that aims to increase the number of pupils from under-represented backgrounds who progress to highly-selective universities, who contributed a post on How to Develop Critical Thinking.

Dr. Lucy Erickson, a Science and Technology Policy Fellow through the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), hosted by the National Science Foundation (NSF), who contributed posts on Background Noise and Classroom Design, Visual “Noise“, Distractibility, and Classroom Design, Technology, Distractibilty, and the Classroom, and Language about Ability, Mindset, and Motivation and Performance.

Dr. Andrew Butler, an Associate Professor in the Department of Education and the Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, who contributed a post on Multiple-Choice Testing.

Tricia Taylor, a former teacher and lead practitioner in schools in London, UK and Brooklyn, who contributed a post on Exploring Retrieval Practice with Younger Students.

Wendee White, a Lecturer in the School of Education and Social Work at the University of Dundee, Scotland, who contributed a post on The Relationship between Affect and Cognition in Teaching and Learning.

Miko M. Wilford, an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, who contributed a post on The Dark Side of Interleaving.

Dr. Peter Verkoeijen, an Associate Professor in educational psychology at the Department of Education, Psychology, and Child Studies at Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. He is also professor of applied sciences in the Brain and Learning research group at Avans University of Applied Sciences in Breda. Dr. Anton den Boer, a Lecturer at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Avans University of Applied Sciences. He is also chairman of first-year education committee. They contributed a post on Cumulative Compensatory Assessment in Engineering Education.

Dr Melissa Swisher, a Lecturer in Psychological Sciences at Purdue University, who contributed a post on Equivalence-based Instruction in the Classroom.

Weekly Digest #133: Technology for Math Learning

0
Weekly Digest #133: Technology for Math Learning

Josh has created a number of free mathematics lesson apps for middle school based on the science of learning. Guzinta Math lesson apps can be used at school, at home, or both. They include video instruction, interactive modules, worked examples, instructor notes, and–the key–a design which provides retrieval practice, and monitors students’ practice so that they revisit material after calculated delays.

Spaced Practice for Skill Learning

0
Spaced Practice for Skill Learning

By Cindy Nebel

Psychologists often breakdown memory into different types. Long-term memory can be divided into two different types: explicit memories and implicit memories. Explicit memories are memories for events and facts. They are memories that we can easily think and talk about. Implicit memories are a bit different. Implicit memories include procedural (muscle) memories as well as some other types of automatic processing.

The primary focus of most of the things on our site is the acquisition and retention of factual information, which would fall into the explicit memory category. When we talk about spaced practice, we often talk about studying in small sessions over the course of time instead of studying in one long session.

Sometimes when we talk about the six strategies for effective learning, we get a little push-back from educators who state that they don’t want their students to simply memorize information, but to understand it. Thankfully, the six strategies do promote understanding. We also sometimes hear that we are talking about learning facts, but that is not useful in other areas, such as art. But again, we’ve talked about the usefulness of the strategies in lots of other subjects (and even for dressage!).

Today I want to talk a little bit more about how we can use one of the strategies, spaced practice, to improve learning of implicit memories – of skills. While teaching a course on Learning last week, I told the students about a classic study showing that spacing works not only for explicit learning, but also for skill learning. Here is that study:

Baddeley and Longman (1) trained postal workers on a new typing task that sorted mail. At the time, this was a very practical matter. Going from hand sorting to mechanical sorting would require training up to 10,000 new postal workers, so doing this in the most efficient way was key. They started out by training 72 workers in sessions that were either 1 or 2 hours long, either 1 or 2 times/day until all of the groups had worked on the training for 60 hours. So the group who training for 1 hour 1 time/day had trained for 60 days, but the group that trained for 2 hours 2 times/day had only trained for 12 days. Note that each group received the same amount of training and that they were paid the same amount to do that training.

Below, you can see the results of part of that study. This shows the number of hours that it took for each group to learn the new typing skill. Those that practiced for 1 hour once/day took considerably fewer hours to learn the new skill than did those who practiced for 2 hours twice/day. In fact, the fastest person in the latter group took 2 hours longer than the slowest person in the former group.

Reaching Through the Wall

0
Reaching Through the Wall

Note for Teachers: Join our Feb. 6 free webinar on teaching with New York Times-inspired writing prompts. Sign up here.

_________

What story could this image tell?

Use your imagination to write the opening of a short story or poem inspired by this illustration.

Post it in the comments, then read the related article to find out what this image is all about.

Find many more ways to use our Picture Prompt feature in this lesson plan.

Word + Quiz: savant

0
Word + Quiz: savant

Note: Our Sixth Annual 15-Second Vocabulary Video Challenge is underway. It will run until Feb. 18.

: someone who has been admitted to membership in a scholarly field

_________

The word savant has appeared in 59 articles on NYTimes.com in the past year, including on Jan. 9 in “Train Your Brain Like a Memory Champion” by Bryan Clark:

In training like a memory champion, it’s really the visual that’s most important. Each technique we covered capitalizes on the ability to visualize memories rather than simply attempting to recall them. This, as our team of experts notes, is an exercise in futility.

There’s nothing, physiologically speaking, separating memory athletes from people who forget where their keys are or can’t remember what they had for breakfast this morning. The difference is in the training methods, and the time spent in mastering them.

“Overall, I’d say you definitely don’t need to be a savant to have a great memory,” Mr. Mullen said. “If you’re sincerely engaged with a few tricks up your sleeve, you might surprise yourself.”

Weekly News Quiz for Students: Venezuela, Peace Deal, Oscar Nominations

0
Weekly News Quiz for Students: Venezuela, Peace Deal, Oscar Nominations

How well did you follow the news this past week? How many of these 10 questions can you get right?

Will You Be Watching the Super Bowl This Year?

0
Will You Be Watching the Super Bowl This Year?

Note for Teachers: Join our Feb. 6 free webinar on teaching with New York Times-inspired writing prompts. Sign up here.

_________

Are you a football fan? Will you be watching the Super Bowl this Sunday?

If you are a fan, who do you think will win? Why?

If you’re not, is there anything you enjoy about Super Bowl Sunday, whether it’s the Puppy Bowl, the halftime show, the advertisements or even just the snacks?

In “Super Bowl LIII Will Have a Young Coach, an Old Coach and a Lot of Things in Between,” Victor Mather writes about the story lines for Sunday’s game. Here are some of them:

Not every Super Bowl is super, and we’ll find out if this year’s edition fits the tag on Feb. 3. But we do know some of what is in store.

One of those things is (no surprise) the New England Patriots, who will be appearing in their third consecutive Super Bowl and fourth in five years. The Rams will be the first team to represent Los Angeles in the game since 1984.

Those are not the only records and oddities about Super Bowl LIII.

Game of Ages

Sean McVay, who took over the Rams last season after a meteoric rise as an N.F.L. assistant, turns 33 this week, which will make him the youngest head coach in Super Bowl history. He breaks the record held by Mike Tomlin, who was 36 when his Pittsburgh Steelers won the big game in 2009.

At 66, Bill Belichick will not be the oldest Super Bowl coach, as Marv Levy went to the game with the Bills at age 67 and 68. But Belichick could become the oldest winner, breaking the record held by Tom Coughlin, who was 65 when the Giants beat the Patriots in 2012.

Game of Ages II

Tom Brady is 41 and will become the oldest Super Bowl starting quarterback. He breaks the record set by, well, Tom Brady last year.

At 24, Jared Goff is not the youngest Super Bowl starter, but he’s not far off. Dan Marino was the youngest, at 23 years 127 days, and Ben Roethlisberger was just behind him at 23 years 340 days.

By the Number

The Roman numerals have reached LIII, or 53. You could also call it Super Bowl 110101 if you prefer binary numbers or Super Bowl 35 if hexadecimal is more your thing.

It’s the first prime-number Super Bowl since XLVII (Ravens over 49ers, 34-31.)

Among the athletes who have worn No. 53: Don Drysdale, Harry Carson, Artis Gilmore and Darryl Dawkins.

Diversion

Pop band Maroon 5 and rappers Big Boi and Travis Scott will perform the halftime show. Up with People, which headlined the show four times, is still awaiting its first appearance since 1986.

Gladys Knight will sing the national anthem, a year after Pink did the honors. Knight will join an odd mix of stars to carry out the duties, a list that includes Lady Gaga (2016), Billy Joel (1989 and 2007), Cher (1999), Kathie Lee Gifford (1995) and Al Hirt (1970).

Gamblers are saying the anthem performance will last 1 minute 50 seconds. You can bet on it. Or on whether a player will kneel (5-1 against). Or if a fan runs on the field (15-1). Or the color of Adam Levine of Maroon 5’s shirt (Black is the favorite) or whether a Coke or Pepsi commercial will appear first, or — well, you get the idea.

Students, read the entire article, then tell us:

— Are you planning to watch Super Bowl LIII? If so, what are you most looking forward to — the game, the commercials, the parties or the halftime show? If not, why not?

— If you’re a football fan, what do you think of the matchup of the Los Angeles Rams and the New England Patriots? Who are you rooting for? Who do you think will win? What do you think will be the final score? Which players do you think will stand out and why?

— Of the narratives outlined in the article, which story line is most compelling to you and why?

— What do you think about the choice for this season’s Super Bowl halftime performers? If you could see anyone perform at the Super Bowl, whom would you want to see, and why?

How Much Do You Know About Mexico?

0
How Much Do You Know About Mexico?

Can you find Mexico on a map? What else do you know about this Latin American country with 126 million people.

Learning System Award Winners 2019

0
Learning System Award Winners 2019

If you were in the nineties here in the states, and had a postal address, you likely received the Publisher’s Clearinghouse sweepstakes.  I know I did. And every time I got it, I dreamed that a scratch card here for more choices, scratch card there – “What even more drawings?”, I knew this would be the year.   I mean it said no purchase necessary, but come on, deep down you have to buy one crummy magazine, because wink wink, that’s your ticket in.

And so you and millions of your fellow human beings mailed it in.  And waited. 

Well, wait no more.   Ed McMahon is not back (he’s dead after all), but in his honor, and without you having to buy an overpriced magazine,  I present you with early award winners in various learning system categories, for 2019. 

But first…

What is a Learning System?

Because of the size of the market and split out of types of systems, it made sense to create an umbrella term and then place the main four types of systems under said umbrella.  

Hence, learning systems.   The biggest market in size and scope are LMSs (Learning Management Systems).  LCMSs are not LMSs, nor do they see themselves as one, just an fyi.   The second market in size are LEP/LXPs – Learning Engagement Platforms/Learning Experience Platforms.  The third market are learning platforms – these are folks who have many of the standards, include training/learning components, but are not an LMS (and often are more streamlined).  A training management system for example, would slide under learning platforms, same as a training operations system.  Knowledge Reinforcement systems?  Learning Platforms. 

The fourth category are what I call, Other.   Yes, very original I know.   In this category, you will find Performance Mgt or Talent Mgt systems with a learning/training component or module.  These systems do not see learning/training as number on in their solutions, and usually go with a module approach.   Sales Enablement Platforms which have a training and/or learning component – now slide into this category. A coaching system which incorporate training/learning modality, fits here.

The Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019

The official rankings, report and posts will happen in January of 2019.  I will let you know that all 50 of them will be in FindAnLMS.com, assuring that the best of the best can be found in one central location – for you to contact them, schedule demos, send RFPs and more.    Actually, as of today, 48 of them are in the system, with the last two arriving by Jan, 1, 2019.

However, since the holidays are nearly upon us (I mean you might be reading this for the first time in late Dec.),  I’d like to announce who are in the Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019.   They have not been notified yet, so it is like finding out the PCH winner is based in neverheardofyou small town, planet earth.

Type of Learning System will be noted.   Methodology will be coming in the post with the final rankings, and breakdowns.

In no particular order, but for folks wondering what type of learning system they are, the first group are in the LMS market

  • eLogic, Growth Engineering, Litmos by SAP, CrossKnowledge Learning Suite, MATRIX, Kokm, Roundtable Learning, SumTotal Learning Management, Cornerstone Learn, GyrusAim Learning Cloud, Tessello, Agylia
  • Unicorn LMS, Upside LMS, IMC Learning Suite, Torch LMS, glo Learn
  • Spoke, Eurekos, Thought Industries, Schoox, LMS 365, Instancy On Demand Learning Platform
  • Fuse, Workday Learning, LearnUpon, BizLibrary LMS, Create LMS, Talent LMS, eXact LCMS, Kallidus Learn, Accord LMS
  • Docebo, Asentia LMS, Syfadis Experience, Saba, G-Cube, Brainier LMS, Persona Learning Management, SkyPrep, Blackboard (Corp version), 

LEP/LXP market

  • Learn Amp, Percipio by Skillsoft, Degreed, TILE by Toolwire, EdCast LXP and Knowledge Cloud, Coorpacademy LEP, 360Learning, Looop, Springest Go

After seeing the latest version of Saba and talking to execs, and the recent acquisition of Lumesse with me:time too, Saba returns to the Top 50. 

I can state that two LEP/LXPs are in the 2019 Top 10 Learning Systems, err 11. Because for the first time ever, a tie at #10. Here they are in no particular order (sorry, you will have to wait for final rankings in Jan).

  • eLogic, Litmos by SAP, Growth Engineering, SumTotal Learning Management, Coorpacademy, Unicorn LMS, Docebo, CrossKnowledge Learning Suite, Fuse and Learn Amp and Brainier LMS.

 

uwin

Early Award Winners in various categories

Folks always ask me who is the best in gamification or extended enterprise.  Who is NexGen? (already announced, but will re-announce here)  What about mobile?  True NetFlix like experience?  Fun for the whole family – err fun for learners?  Edtech?  My vertical in Software or Retail or Dog snacks?

Because these breakouts could go longer than an Oscar speech, the majority will be the category followed by the vendor. In a couple of cases, #2 and #3 may be mentioned.  When * is seen, this indicates that the vendor is in FindAnLMS. 

I will bring back our favorite announcer, ED…. Mc…Marley!

CWGDEd McMarley

“Salutations! Big night here. Big night. I know you are waiting with anticipation, so envelopes, please!!!”

“And the winner is….”

K-6 (Education) – Frog Learn  .  Simply, the best K-6 LMS on the market.  Not even close.

6-12 or you want the K-12 whole package –  Schoology   Very slick and strong system for the education.

Higher Education – “and the nominees are….

  • Blackboard Learn,  D2L, NEO LMS

“And the winner is…”   NEO LMS *. Go with the “Enterprise edition”, which yeah, I agree is not a term that is used or should be used in the education market, this is the edition that the win is tied too.

Award Winners

greenie

Best Learning System for Gamification –   There were plenty to select from this year, but in the end it came down to three systems, one is Coorpacademy an LEP, who offers battles as part of their gamification, Gameffective, strong in gamification, and Growth Engineering which is an LMS wrapped around gamification (but quite robust).  GE also has battles, games and the usage of Knowledge Arcade. 

“And the winner is..”

Growth Engineering*.  As the Iron Chief would say, “Reigns supreme”.  

Best Learning System for Social Engagement  – Fuse*

Best Learning System for mobile –  Edapp aka Ed*.

Best NetFlix like experience –  Yes, many say they are – but are they really? Sure, none offer recommended content that you would never take, because they either made it themselves or it is “Cookies made of meat,” which besides sounding disgusting, isn’t something I’d watch.  Anyway..

“And the winner is…” – Coorpacademy *  Their site does not do the product justice.  Workday Learning was a close second.

Best LEP/LXP for 2019 – Learn Amp *

#1 NexGen LMS for 2018-19 – Litmos by SAP *.   Fuse and Cornerstone were neck and neck for #2 and #3.

Best LMS for Extended Enterprise – eLogic *.  Unlimited tenants (no additional charge), same with skinning each tenant too. Robust e-commerce, robust platform period.  I’ve seen the roadmap, and can tell you, this behemoth feature rich system is on track for even bigger things.

Best LMS for Compliance and Regulatory – Cobent! Wait..They were acquired a long time ago, and their new owners are not as strong, so nope, Cobent you are out.

SumTotal Learning Management * takes home the prize.   Unicorn LMS * a very good LMS rumbled in at #2. 

Top Three LMSs when budget is extremely tight and you still want a very solid system.  I could call this most affordable LMS category.  I focused on mid-size numbers i.e. 6000 end users tied to affordability.  Features had to be a min. of 70% of my LMS RFP Template. 

  • Talent LMS *  – Very affordable, Solid system.
  • BizLibrary * – you get a lot for a very good price point
  • UpsideLMS *  – You get a lot for the price. 

I had Bridge LMS a very close fourth, and Abara LMS *finishing off at #5.  Again, this is based on 6,000 user base. 

Why 6,000?  Some vendors go with a price range, and thus a 5,000 might slide into a range of a vendor going up to 5,999.  6,000 tends to slide into a completely different price range, than one at 5,000.   Anyway, that was my approach to pricing.

Verticals!  Verticals!

These are vendors who score high in certain verticals.   Not every vertical is listed, because there are so many of them (verticals) that is. 

#1 LMS for Financial Services – Unicorn LMS.*  If you are in FS, this is the system to select. 

#1 LMS for Consumer Goods – Spoke *

#1 LMS for Retail – eLogic *

#1 LMS for Technology (Software) – Litmos by SAP *

#1 LMS for Manufacturing – SumTotal Learning Management * . Saba was #2. For Cornerstone fans, finished in the top five.

The Following Categories will be announced in Jan. as part of the Top 50 Learning Systems for 2019

  • Enterprise
  • B2B/B2C  (External only)
  • Innovation (new category)
  • Associations
  • Hospitality
  • Non-Profit
  • Government
  • Content with the system (new category) – Means the system comes with content that is no cost to you.
  • Content and Learning Tech marketplace – Which vendor has the best marketplace for content and learningtech?
  • Analytics –  What is the best system for robust analytics, data with forward-thinking type of analytics?  You will find out here.  Interesting to note, the winner and runner-ups all have an LRS.  Wait, all that were in this category, have an LRS
  • Best Learning System for Coaching (new category)
  • Best Learning System for AI/Machine Learning (new category)

Bottom Line

If you did not want to buy a magazine, but wanted to enter Publishers Sweepstakes, all you had to do was find an index card with a specific size followed by rules of doing it this way, not that way, before mailing it off.

It was irksome. 

Good thing the early award winners here and top 50 noted above, require none of those things.

Well, maybe

an index card.

E-Learning 24/7

Upcoming post – Percipio by Skillsoft Product Review with screenshots too!

 

 

 

 

2018 Turkey Awards for E-Learning

0
2018 Turkey Awards for E-Learning

I have the most important shirt of the past four decades.  The shirt that announced on that terrible day, the turkey drop of WKRP in Cincinnati.  Who can forget the live feed of Les describing the ill-fated promotion.   If you have forgotten, no worries – here it is

 

While Ben Franklin was turning over in his grave (he wanted the Turkey as our national bird), others were fleeing for their lives.

I get it.

Eating a turkey is one thing, watching its attempt to fly is another, but winning a turkey award is something entirely different. 

Award Insight

Winning a Turkey Award I think is right up there with winning an Oscar if said Oscar is for “what the heck.. or ” huh?”.   It should be a badge of honor, I mean not everyone is in the running here, and its just a select few per category.   I know some of you will disagree with the nominees, perhaps feeling that your company or vendor should be in there, and I totally respect that.

This is why, in the comments section, you can list your own nominees for Turkey Award of the People, then a vote will take place (not valid in Florida – I mean its been what 18 yrs and you still haven’t invested in new voting machines).  Please refrain from naming people’s names or folks you just despise.  In other words, don’t include me in your nominations. 

Categories

Web Conferencing  – There are some really good ones out there this year. They have to be paying services and not the free ones.   Otherwise Blue Button would win hands down. 

Learning Systems that need an update or several aka “Let’s not party like its 1999”.   Pretty self-explanatory, although I still can’t understand why that seems to be a challenge.  I mean if a turkey can wear tennis shoes, why can’t you update your system?

FunctionalityTotally in learning systems here.  Some functionality are just turkeys.  Pardoning options do not apply.

Terms used in the industry –  I surmise that are turkey retiree places, where you know they are safe from consumption and live out there days, gobbling around, chilling with the weeds and doing whatever turkeys do when they are bored.   These terms should be retired. Feel free to hang out with Timmy, he likes to run at the sound of a dinner bell.

Award Icons

fleeturkeyRepresents Nominees

 turkeywinner – Turkey Award Winner

Category 1

Web Conferencing

A sound crop (you thought I would say something else – admit it) of choices this fine year.  Finalists were based on the quality of call on average (based on the number of times I was on a call with this tool – used by various vendors showing me their products or having a briefing, etc.).   Extra points for freeze ups, lags and bring you in as “mute” so when you talk, no one knows, not even you. 

fleeturkey

GoToMeeting –  You have only been around for a long, long time and yet you still seem to be stuck in the “pre-mute you” approach.  I as only one voice, hate that.   I think others do as well, they just can’t tell you, because they are on mute.   UI/UX needs a serious overhaul.

join.me Recording should come as a standard with this tool.  I mean, there are freebies out there that can have more than five folks on, and record automatically (join.me at their Lite version – recording is not included).   Another needs a UI/UX update. 

Blackboard Collaborate  I actually liked this when it first came out, but since then I have heard from folks who use it, that well, it isn’t as great as it could be, let alone good.  Shame really. 

Turkey drum roll please…

turkeywinner GoTo Meeting.  Funny story, years ago, I had a web conference call with the folks from GTM and during the call, the video froze and people got kicked off the call.  Not a good sign.  Anyway, it’s better now, but still the controls are not intuitive as much as they should be, and Zoom is far superior, even though they haven’t been in the market as long as GoToMeeting. 

Category 2

Let’s not party like its 1999

I understand that cost is building/adding/enhancing or downright removing is pricey.  This is why I looked at vendors who I know have the cash flow and deep pockets.  So there really isn’t any excuse.

fleeturkey

OLM  I sometimes get folks who ask me about Oracle’s Enterprise LMS, better known as OLM.  After a brief chuckle (I’m kidding here),  I let them know that this system is not good – this is just an example of a system that needs a major revamp. 

Anyone remember those old Oracle CDs they gave you for training?  I think I used them for Frisbee practice.  You can buy so many systems that integrate well with Oracle, so why stay in-house with their own platform?  No, seriously, I’m asking why.

SuccessFactors Yes they have some very good functionality, but the system as a whole is a major letdown.  I mean Plateau was really garbage and then SF took it over and made it way better.   Then, the updates while they kept coming, seemed to be just “eh.”  I get that SAP sees SF as an HCM (the product was initially ideal for recruiting, as I recall), but it is pitched to large companies as this amazing offering which includes learning.   I should note that the SAP LMS (which as one exec years ago told me, is like a toss-in for folks who want to stick with SAP), is even worse.    

This is one reason why if I was SAP, I’d strip out some things with SF, place those extras as a mod for Litmos by SAP customers so that Litmos is your only LMS. 

SucessFactors has a good chance of being a repeated winner.  Turkey wings crossed.

Canvas by Instructure –  There is plenty to like in this LMS for HigherEd and K-12, and while they are strong of the functionality, they are weak IMO with the whole UX for educators who are the ones adding the content, courses, etc.   Students I can see how they would like it, but I wouldn’t buy this platform if I was in the K-6 crowd (Frog wins hands-down as the best LMS for K-6). 

For me, it needs better capabilities on the admin side and as with other HE platforms out there the authoring tool that comes with it focuses the whole synchronous angle – which you know, is not the way to build an effective SBL, let alone an engaging course.

turkeywinnerSuccessFactors.   I know I couldn’t believe it myself.  I mean after I got the envelope out of Cali’s mouth  (named after Baja California), and was able to see thru the chew marks, I just had to let folks know.   I will say it once more SAP, let Litmos be your primary system and not this, wait for it, turkey.

Category 3

Functionality

As a vendor in the learning system space, you need to constantly evolve. Offer new functionality and capabilities beyond the standards that exist (what I define as min. standard functionality).      That isn’t to say, you dump standards like a learning path – which is a must for any system,  but there are functions that should be tossed on the heap like COP (remember communities of practice in the mid-2000’s? I still try to forget).

fleeturkey

Chat Rooms –  I am excited to announce that same vendors in the space have put this one out to pasture. However, the majority have not.   Let’s see you offer a web conferencing integration or maybe you have one; so that should take care easily of a text-based chat room.  How old are text chat rooms?  I built a website in 1994 for teachers and uh, it had a text-based chat room, and a forum discussion board too.   I say no more.

Forum/Discussion board –  This is another feature that not even cranberry sauce should save.  Outdated.  If you are wanting features of the soon to be Gen Z and yes the millennials, then this is not one of them.  Go voice messaging or video boards or heck anything that is not an actual I read what you wrote, then I respond, then the teacher or instructor responds back thing.   Better yet, go with a robust coaching/ask an expert component (the best way to resolve this old-school method).

Are you seeing a trend here?  Hmm.. why..it is in social

Facebook like design with a wall for streams etc. –   I mean honestly, who wants to be Facebook right now (excluding the $$$$ coming in).  Privacy issues? Check. Subterfuge going on inside the company to deny, even when they knew the fake articles existed? Check.  Those same millennials leaving the system in droves? Check.  Yeah, let’s stay with this amazing approach to social.  I guess MySpace was unavailable?

turkeywinnerForum/Discussion boards.   Another retro classic from the mid 90’s, popular with higher education and education systems.  Mixed with corporate (i.e. some folks love it, others do not).  As they say, a turkey dressed up for Halloween is still a turkey with silly clothing and a pirate eye patch.  BTW, ever tried to use a forum/discussion board on a mobile device?  It’s not pretty.

Category 4

Terms in e-learning that Need to be Retired

fleeturkey

micro-learning –  Enough already.  Please realize that every system on the planet can have micro-learning courses.  You could have had a micro-learning course in 1998.  I had a few in 2000.  In other words, it has been around forever..  So, why do you ask is it such a hot term?  Marketing 101.  Vendors, who pitch they are a micro-learning platform, sometimes have courses/content longer than five minutes?  And as noted way back when, micro means nothing, since e-learning is based on the learner’s learning style and length it takes to comprehend, retain and synthesis.  What takes you three minutes to watch, may take someone else 30 minutes, because they are watching snippets and repeating.   In other words, micro isn’t micro for everyone. 

Social Learning The term was originally devised based on two components, a – learning, b – social media.   Yep, that’s right, that is how social learning the term came about.  Now its morphed into what you see today (which overall isn’t that awesome), but it has some opportunities to change that.  A better term to use in the 21st century (2018 and beyond)? Social Engagement.   Let’s make the switch today and move social learning to the wonderful “Whatever happened to…” group.

Training Management Systems –  What exactly are these?  It is one thing to be a training operations system (which does exist and I can see how folks who seek one, would use one), but the TMS angle, is sort of a hodgepodge.   Some TMSs are really LMSs, but refuse to use the name, because you know, they are not an LMS.  Other TMSs pitch themselves either as ideal for B2B or for folks who want to manage training, which uh, is why an LMS was created in the first place and of which, you can do B2B/B2C as well (if the vendor offers e-commerce and multi-tenant).    I firmly believe we as an industry come up with way too many terms to describe essentially four different types of learning systems.  Thus, the consumer gets confused.  And so do many others too.

turkeywinner Social Learning.   Yes, a stunner.  I know many of you were thinking, “micro, it’s going to be micro,” sorry to disappoint.   

Again, time to change to Social Engagement which is more apropos.

Bottom Line

runturkey

Let’s recap the Turkey Award Winners for 2018

  • Web Conferencing – GoToMeeting 
  • Let’s not party like it’s 1999 – SuccessFactors
  • Functionality – Forum/Discussion Boards
  • Terms in e-learning that Need to be Retired – Social Learning.

Congrats to each of the nominees and of course to the winners.  Not everyone gets to be a turkey.  Some end up as a chicken or tofurkey.  I mean the options are endless.

Just ask Honey Ham.

(Happy Thanksgiving Everyone!)

E-Learning 24/7

There will be no blog post next week.   However, I am conducting a survey on the learning system space, content and mobile too.   Results to be published in the blog in Dec. You will make an important role, so please take a few minutes (avg time is just under three minutes) to complete this quick survey